Effect of the probiotic activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on productive and health indicators of piglets

Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 75-79

  Bocourt, R ^a   Savón, Lourdes ^a   Diaz J ^a   Brizuela, María A ^b   Serrano, P ^b   Prats, Anais ^a   Elias A ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA ANIMAL   (Cuba)

^b Inst Cubano Invest Cana de Azucar   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Health; Lactobacillus rhamnosus; Piglets; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 4444364457     PISSN: 08640408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Álvarez, P. 1995. Los probióticos como complemento alimenticio. Mundo Ganadero 11:38
2. Alltech 1995. BIO-MOS in the poultry Industry. Biotechnology in the feed industry. Supplement to the proceedings of Alltech's Biotechnology in the feed industry. Proc. Alltech Annual Symposium. Ed. T.P. Lyons. Nicholasville, USA
3. Biricik, H. & Türkmen, Y.Y. 2001. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro rumen digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter and neutral detergent fibre of different forage: concentrate ratios in diets. J. Fac. Vet. Med. 20:29
4. Bomba, V.A., Gancariková, S., Nemcová, R., Herich, R., Kastel', R., Depta, A. Demeterova, M., Ledeck, V. & Zitnan, R. 1998. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on intestinal metabolism and metabolic profile of gnotobiotic pigs. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wschr. 105:384
5. Brizuela, M.A. 2003. Selección de cepas de bacterias ácido lácticas para la obtención de un preparado con propiedades probióticas y su evaluación en cerdos. Thesis Dr. Sci. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. La Habana. Cuba. p. 35
6. Cole, D.J. 1991. The role of the nutritionist in designing feeds for the future. Pig News Inf. 12:393
7. Duncan, B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1
8. Havenar, R. & Huis in't Veld, J. 1992. The lactic acid bacteria: Vol. 1. The lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. Ed. B. J. Wood. p. 151
9. Hernández, J., Eustaquiano, F., Pérez, J., González, J., Azum, J., García, L., Llanes, O., Hernández, R. & Reyes, J. 1997. Evaluación clínico práctica de la aplicación de probiótico en cerdos neonatos durante el període 1994-96. Jornada Científica Pedagógica. 90 Aniversario de la Educación Veterinaria en Cuba. Resúmenes. Instituto Superior de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Habana. p. 60
10. Jin, L.Z., Marquar, R.R. & Zhoe, X. 2000. A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits adhesion of enterocoligenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine small intestine mucus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4200
11. Jonsson, E. 1986. Persistence of Lactobacillus strain in the gut of sucking piglets and its influence on performance and health. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 16:43
12. Link, H., Rochat, F., Saudan, K., Mignot, O. & Aeschlimann, J. 1994. Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora mediated through fermented milk intake. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 10:55
13. Majamaa, H. & Isolauri, E. 1997. Probiotic a novel approach in the management of food allergy. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. 99:179
14. Mosson, P. 2001. Probiotics and prebiotics. Pharm. J. 266:118
15. Mulder, R. 1991. Probiotics as a tool against salmonella contamination. World Poult. 7:35
16. Neumann, E. 1998. Mono association with Lactobacillus acidophilus UFV-H2b20 stimulates the immune defense mechanisms of germ free mice. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 3:1565
17. Novak, J., Danek, P., Adam, L., Semradova, H. & Diblikova, E. 1991. Comparison of the efficieny of domestic probiotics in piglets. Zivoc. Vyr. 36:403
18. Piloto, J.L., Juncal, J., Brizuela, M. & Serrano, P. 2000. Utilización del probiotico PROBLAC (Lactobacillus rhamnosuss) en cerdos desde el nacimiento hasta el destete. I Convención Internacional de Porcicultura "Porcinocultura 2000". La Habana. p. 49
19. Sainsbury, D. 1993. Protecting against stress. Probiotics boots natural resistance. Pigs 9:37
20. Swientek, B. 2003. Beneficial bacteria. Prebiotics and probiotics work in tandem to stimulate a healthy microflora in the gastrointestinal tract. Food product development. 〈http://www.preparedfood.com/archives/2001/2001_01/ 0101toc.htm〉 [Consulting date: 5 de febrero de 2003]
21. Tortuero, F., Rioperez, J., Fernández, E. & Rodriguez, M.L. 1995. Response of piglets to oral administration of lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Protect. 58:1369
22. Vandelle, M., Teller, E. & Focant, M. 1990. Probiotics in animal nutrition: a review. Arch. Amm. 40:507
23. Wang, J., Huang, C.J., Hsich, J.S., Juang, F. & Huang, T.J. 1995. Management of the perineal wounds following excision of the rectun for malignancy. Kao N Siung I Hsueh ko Hsueh Tsa chin. Apr 10:497-8
24. Wenk, C. 1990. Yeast culture, lactobacilli and a mixture of enzymes in diets for growing pigs and chickens under Swiss condition of the nutriens and energy. In: Biotechnology in the feed industry. Proc. Alltech's Sixth Annual Symposium. Technical Publications. Nicholasville, USA. p. 315