Hemispheric integration and differences in perception of a line-motion illusion in the divided brain

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 42, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 1852-1857

  Corballis, Michael C ^a   Barnett, Kylie J ^a   Fabri, Mara ^b   Paggi, Aldo ^b   Corballis, Paul M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Callosal agenesis; Hemispheric differences; Hemispheric integration; Motion perception; Split brain

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CORPUS CALLOSUM AGENESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; SPLIT BRAIN; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 4444360906     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bavelier D., Schneider K.A., Monacelli A. Reflexive gaze orienting induces the line-motion illusion. Vision Research. 42:2002;2817-2827
2. Carlson, N. R. (1991). Physiology of behavior (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Corballis M.C., Corballis P.M. Interhemispheric visual matching in the split brain. Neuropsychologia. 39:2001;1395-1400
4. Corballis M.C., Corballis P.M., Fabri M. Redundancy gain in simple reaction time following partial and complete callosotomy. Neuropsychologia. 42:2004;71-81
5. Corballis M.C., Finlay D.C. Interhemispheric visual integration in three cases of familial callosal agenesis. Neuropsychology. 14:2000;60-70
6. Corballis M.C., Trudel C.I. The role of the forebrain commissures in interhemispheric integration. Neuropsychology. 7:1993;306-324
7. Corballis P.M., Funnell M.G., Gazzaniga M.S. An investigation of the line motion effect in a callosotomy patient. Brain and Cognition. 48:2002;327-332
8. Downing P.E., Treisman A.M. The line-motion illusion: attention or impletion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 23:1997;768-779
9. Enns, J. T., Kingstone, A. (1997). Hemispheric cooperation in visual search: Evidence from normal and split-brain observers. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processes (pp. 197-231). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Fabri M., Polonara G., Quattrini A., Salvolini U., Del Pesce M., Manzoni T. Role of the corpus callosum in the somatosensory activation of the ipsilateral cerebral cortex: An fMRI study of callosotomized subjects. European Journal of Neuroscience. 11:1999;3983-3994
11. Finlay D.C., Peto T., Payling J., Hunter M., Fulham W.R., Wilkinson I. A study of three cases of familial related agenesis of the corpus callosum. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 22:2000;731-742
12. Gazzaniga M.S. Perceptual and attentional processes following callosal section in humans. Neuropsychologia. 25:1987;119-133
13. Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain. 123:2000;1293-1326
14. Gazzaniga M.S., Holtzman J.D., Deck M.D.E., Lee B.C.P. MRI assessment of human callosal surgery with neuropsychological correlates. Neurology. 35:1985;682-685
15. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences. 15:1992;20-25
16. Hess R.H., Baker C.L., Zihl J. The "motion blind" patient: Low-level spatial and temporal filters. Journal of Neuroscience. 9:1989;1628-1640
17. Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Shimojo S. Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research. 33:1993a;1219-1240
18. Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Shimojo S. Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation. Perception. 22:1993b;517-526
19. Hines R.J., Paul L.K., Brown W.S. Spatial attention in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Shifting attention between visual fields. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;1804-1814
20. Holtzman J.D. Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: Evidence from human commissurotomy patients. Vision Research. 24:1984;801-813
21. Holtzman J.D., Sidtis J.J., Volpe B.T., Wilson D.H., Gazzaniga M.S. Dissociation of spatial information for stimulus localization and the control of attention. Brain. 104:1981;861-872
22. Holtzman, J. D., Volpe, B. T., Gazzaniga, M. S. (1984). Spatial orientation following commissural section. In R. Parasuraman, D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 375-394). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
23. Johnson L.E. Bilateral cross integration by human forebrain commissurotomy subjects. Neuropsychologia. 22:1984;167-175
24. M. Lassonde, M. A. Jeeves (Eds.). (1994). Callosal agenesis: A natural split brain? New York: Plenum Press.
25. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A., Luck S.J., Hany T., Plager R., Clark V.P., et al. Monitoring the visual world: Hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 6:1994;267-275
26. Naikar N., Corballis M.C. The perception of apparent motion across the retinal midline after commissurotomy. Neuropsychologia. 34:1996;297-309
27. Nicholls M.E.R. Temporal processing asymmetries between the cerebral hemispheres: Evidence and implications. Laterality. 2:1996;97-137
28. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113
29. Ramachandran V.S., Cronin-Golomb A., Myers J.J. Perception of apparent motion by commissurotomy patients. Nature. 320:1986;358-359
30. Rodman H.R., Gross C.G., Albright T.D. Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. Effects of striate cortex removal. Journal of Neuroscience. 9:1989;2033-2050
31. Schmidt W.C. Endogenous attention and the illusory line motion illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26:2000;980-996
32. von Grünau M., Faubert J. Inter- and intra-attribute effects in motion induction. Perception. 23:1994;913-928