A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a stroop effect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 323-338

  Algom, Daniel ^a   Chajut, Eran ^b   Lev, Shlomo ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ISRAEL; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; EMOTIONS; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ISRAEL; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 4444359781     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Algom, D., Dekel, A., & Pansky, A. (1993). On the perception of number. In A. Garriga-Trillo, P. R. Minon, C. Garcia-Gallego, C. Lubin, J. M. Merino, & A. Villarino (Eds.), Fechner Day '93 (pp. 1-6). Palma de Mallorca, Spain: International Society for Psychophysics.
2. Algom, D., Dekel, A., & Pansky, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited. Memory & Cognition, 24, 557-572.
3. Arieh, Y., & Algom, D. (1997). Kriat milim bemesimot Stroop: Haspaat hatelut ben hamarkivim hasemantiim vehahazutiim [Reading words in Stroop-like tasks: The effect of the contingency between semantic and visual components]. Psychologia, 6, 7-19.
4. Arieh, Y., & Algom, D. (2002). Processing picture-word stimuli: The I contingent nature of picture and of word superiority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 221-232.
5. Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181-199.
6. Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1019-1038.
7. Chajut E., & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 231-248.
8. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or to avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224.
9. Clark, H. H., & Brownell, H. H. (1975). Judging up and down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 339-352.
10. Cohen, D. J. (1997). Visual detection and perceptual independence: Assessing color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 623-635.
11. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
12. De Houwer, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect attitude measures. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
14. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
15. Gotlib, I. H., & Cane, D. B. (1987). Construct accessibility and clinical depression: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 199-204.
16. Gotlib, I. H., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Construct accessibility and depression: An examination of cognitive and affective factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 427-439.
17. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). The effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
18. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 166-183.
19. Holmes, V. M., & Langford, J. (1976). Comprehension and recall of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 559-566.
20. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638-644.
21. Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43-75.
22. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Klee, H., & Eyesenk, M. W. (1973). Comprehension of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior. 12, 522-529.
24. Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
25. Kuhl, J., & Kazen, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 128, 382-399.
26. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
27. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
28. MacLeod, C., & Hagan, R. (1992). Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information and emotional responses to a stressful life event. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 151-161.
29. MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Accessibility of information or assignment of processing priorities? Behavioural Research and Therapy, 29, 599-610.
30. MacLeod, C., Tata, P., & Mathews, A. (1987). Perception of emotionally valenced information in depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 67-68.
31. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
32. Masson, E. J., Bub, D. N., Woodward, T. S., & Chan, J. C. K. (2003). Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 400-418.
33. Mathews, G., & Harley, T. (1996). Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 561-600.
34. McGinnies, E. (1949). Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 39, 242-255.
35. McKenna, F. P. (1986). Effects of unattended emotional stimuli on color-naming performance. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, 3-9.
36. McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1595-1607.
37. McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2002). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect: The role of fast and slow components. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110, 422-471.
39. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimension: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627-645.
40. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1994). Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 73-90.
41. Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Williams, R., & Mathews, A. M. (1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 304-311.
42. Öhman, A. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information-processing mechanisms. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 511-536). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466-478.
44. Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 39-58.
45. Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 259-274.
46. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 516-540.
47. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Pratto, F. (1994). Consciousness and automatic evaluation. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye (pp. 115-143). New York: Academic Press.
49. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.
50. Sabri, M., Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2001). A confluence of contexts: Asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to Stroop dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 515-537.
51. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decision for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499-520.
52. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82-102.
53. Shalev, L., & Algom, D. (2000). Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: Reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 997-1017.
54. Sharma, D., & McKenna, F. P. (2001). The role of time pressure on the emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 471-481.
55. Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 173-392.
56. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Pergamon Press.
57. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial-verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
58. Suslow, T., Ohrmann, P., & Arolt, V. (2001). Ausgestaltung sogennanter affektiver Voraktivierungseffekte in der evaluativen Entscheidungsaufgabe: Hinweise auf automatische Vigilanz fuer negative Informationen [Direction of so-called affecting priming effects in the evaluation tasks: Evidence for automatic vigilance for negative information]. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 209, 137-152.
59. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.
60. Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024-1037.
61. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24.