Aggressiveness and host specificity of Brazilian isolates of Phytophthora infestans

Plant Pathology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 405-413

  Suassuna, N D ^a,b   Maffia, L A ^a   Mizubuti, E S G ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA ALGODÃO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Late blight; Potato; Solanum lycopersicum; Solanum tuberosum; Tomato

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; FUNGAL DISEASE; HOST SPECIFICITY;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHYTOPHTHORA; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; SOLANUM; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 4444359229     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.01043.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson JB, Kohn LM, 1995. Clonality in soilborne, plant pathogenic fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology 33, 369-91.
2. Antonovics J, Alexander HM, 1989. The concept of fitness in plant-fungal pathogen systems. In: Leonard KJ, Fry WE, eds. Plant Disease Epidemiology, Vol. 2. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 185-214.
3. Brommonschenkel SH, 1988. Patogenicidade, compatibilidade, citogenética e padrões isoenzimáticos de isolados de Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) Debary No Brasil. Viçosa, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, MSc Thesis.
4. Carlisle DJ, Cooke LR, Watson S, Brown AE, 2002. Foliar aggressiveness of Northern Ireland isolates of Phytophthora infestans on detached leaflets of three potato cultivars. Plant Pathology 51, 424-34.
5. Caten CE, Jinks JL, 1968. Spontaneous variability of single isolates of Phytophthora infestans. I. Cultural variation. Canadian Journal of Botany 46, 329-48.
6. Ciccarone A, Black W, Bastos Cruz BP, 1959. Observações preliminares sobre as raças de Phytophthora infestans no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 26, 177-84.
7. Cuéllar EJG, Domínguez CG, 1998. Las poblaciones de Phytophthora infestans presentes en papa en el altiplano Cundiboyacense en 1996 son monomorficas para la enzima glucosa-6-fosfato isomerasa. Agronomía Colombiana 15, 7-14.
8. Day JP, Shattock RC, 1997. Aggressiveness and other factors relating to displacement of populations of Phytophthora infestans in England and Wales. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103, 379-91.
9. Draper NR, Smith H, 1998. Applied Regression Analysis. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Erselius LJ, Vega-Sánchez ME, Forbes GA, 2000. Stability in population of Phytophthora infestans attacking tomato in Ecuador demonstrated by cellulose acetate assessment of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase. Plant Disease 84, 325-7.
11. Flier WG, Turkensteen LJ, 1999. Foliar aggressiveness of Phytophthora infestans in three potato growing regions in the Netherlands. European Journal of Plant Pathology 105, 381-8.
12. Fry WE, 1977. Integrated control of potato late blight - effects of polygenic resistance and techniques of timing fungicide applications. Phytopathology 67, 415-20.
13. Ghimire SR, Hyde KD, Hodgkiss IJ, Shaw DS, Liew ECY, 2003. Variations in the Phytophthora infestans population in Nepal as revealed by nuclear and mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms. Phytopathology 93, 236-43.
14. Goodwin SB, Cohen BA, Fry WE, 1994. Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 11591-5.
15. Goodwin SB, Legard DE, Smart CD, Levy M, Fry WE, 1999. Gene flow analysis of molecular markers confirms that Phytophthora mirabilis and P. infestans are separate species. Mycologia 91, 796-810.
16. Kadish D, Grinberger M, Cohen Y, 1990. Fitness of metalaxyl-sensitive and metalaxyl-resistant isolates of Phytophthora infestans on susceptible and resistant potato cultivars. Phytopathology 80, 200-5.
17. Kato M, Mizubuti ES, Goodwin SB, Fry WE, 1997. Sensitivity to protectant fungicides and pathogenic fitness of clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans in the United States. Phytopathology 87, 973-8.
18. Kuehl RO, 1994. Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Belmont, NY, USA: Duxbury Press.
19. Lebreton L, Lucas JM, Andrivon D, 1999. Aggressiveness and competitive fitness of Phytophthora infestans isolates collected from potato and tomato in France. Phytopathology 89, 679-86.
20. Legard DE, Lee TY, Fry WE, 1995. Pathogenic specialization in Phytophthora infestans: aggressiveness on tomato. Phytopathology 85, 1356-61.
21. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
22. McLeod A, Denman S, Sadie A, Denner FDN, 2001. Characterization of South African isolates of Phytophthora infestans. Plant Disease 85, 287-91.
23. Miller JS, Johnson DA, 2000. Competitive fitness of Phytophthora infestans isolates under semiarid field conditions. Phytopathology 90, 220-7.
24. Miller JS, Johnson DA, Hamm PB, 1998. Aggressiveness of isolates of Phytophthora infestans from the Columbia Basin of Washington and Oregon. Phytopathology 88, 190-7.
25. Mizubuti ESG, 2001. Requeima ou Mela da Batata e do Tomate. In: Luz EDN, Santos AF, Matsuoka K, Bezerra JL, eds. Doenças Causadas por Phytophthora no Brasil. Campinas, Brazil: Livraria Editora Rural, 100-74.
26. Mizubuti ESG, Fry WE, 1998. Temperature effects on developmental stages of isolates from three clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 88, 837-43.
27. Ordoñez ME, Forbes GA, Trognitz B, 1998. Relationship between ineffective R-genes and expansion rate of lesions on potato leaves, caused by Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathology 47, 130-6.
28. Oyarzun PJ, Pozo A, Ordoñez ME, Doucett K, Forbes GA, 1998. Host specificity of Phytophthora infestans on tomato and potato in Ecuador. Phytopathology 88, 265-71.
29. Perez WG, Gamboa JS, Falcon YV, Coca M, Raymundo RM, Nelson RJ, 2001. Genetic structure of Peruvian populations of Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 91, 956-65.
30. Reis A, Smart CD, Fry WE, Maffia LA, Mizubuti ESG, 2003. Characterization of Phytophthora infestans isolates from Southern and Southeastern Brazil from 1998 to 2000. Plant Disease 87, 896-900.
31. Smart CD, Myers KL, Restrepo S, Martin GB, Fry WE, 2003. Partial resistance of tomato to Phytophthora infestans is not dependent upon ethylene, jasmonic acid, or salicylic acid signaling pathways. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 16, 141-8.
32. Spielman LJ, McMaster BJ, Fry WE, 1992. Relationships among measurements of fitness and disease severity in Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathology 41, 317-24.
33. Vega-Sánchez ME, Erselius LJ, Rodriguez AM, Bastidas O, Hohl HR, Ojiambo PS, Mukalazi J, Vermeulen T, Fry WE, Forbes GA, 2000. Host adaptation to potato and tomato within the US-1 clonal lineage of Phytophthora infestans in Uganda and Kenya. Plant Pathology 49, 531-9.