Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX® sockets

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 115-120

  Datta, D ^a   Harris, I ^a   Heller, B ^a   Howitt, J ^a   Martin, R ^a  

^a NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPUTATION STUMP; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GAIT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; KINETICS; LEG PROSTHESIS; MALE; PATELLA TENDON; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; REVIEW;

EID: 4444359054     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03093640408726696     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Cluitmans J, Geboers M, Deckers J, Rings F (1994). Experiences with respect to the ICEROSS system for trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 18, 78-83.
2. Convery P, Buis AW (1999). Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrostatic socket Prosthet Orthot Int 23, 107-112.
3. Datta D, Vaidya SK, Howitt J, Gopalan L (1996). Outcome of fitting an ICEROSS prosthesis: views of trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 20, 111-115.
4. Davis RB III, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, GAGE JR (1991). A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Move Sci 10, 575-587.
5. Edwards ML,(2000). Below knee prosthetic socket designs and suspension system. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 11, 585-593.
6. Fergason J, Smith DG (1999). Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation. Clin Orthop 361, 76-84.
7. Hachisuka K. Dozono K. Ogata H, Ohmine S, Shitama H, Shinkoda (1998). Total surface bearing below knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages and clinical implications. Arch Phys Med Rehahil 79, 783-789.
8. Hanspal RS, Fisher K, Nieveen R (2003). Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disabil Rehabil 25, 1278-1280.
9. Herzog W, Nigg BM, Read LJ, Olsson E (1989). Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21, 110-114.
10. Janssens P, Bussmann J, Selles R, Jongenengel C, (2001). Activities of daily living and functional independence in below knee amputee paitents with an ICEX socket compared to patients with a regular prescribed socket: a pilot study. Book of abstracts -10th ISPO World Congress I-6th July 2001 Glasgow, UK.
11. Kristinsson O (1993). The ICEROSS concept: discussion of a philosphy. Prosthet Orthot Int 17, 49-55.
12. Ossur-HE Icex (1996). Technical manual, Reykjavik, Iceland.
13. Radcliffe CW, Foort J (1961). Biomechanics of below knee prosthetics. The patellar-tendon bearing below knee prosthesis. -Berkeley: University of California, 26-52.
14. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H (2000). Symmetry and limb dominance in able bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture 12, 34-45.
15. Selles R, Bussmann J. Janssens P, Jongenengel C (2001). Gait characteristics of below knee amputee patients walking with an ICEX® socket compared to patients with a regular prescribed socket: a pilot study. Book of abstracts - 10th ISPO World Congress 1-6th July 2001 Glasgow, UK.
16. Selles R (2003). Personal communications.