Applications of a parametric model for informative censoring

Biometrics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 704-714

  Siannis, Fotios ^a  

^a MRC BIOSTATISTICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Informative censoring; Parametric models; Relative risk; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FAILURE PROCESS; INFORMATIVE CENSORING; LOCATION PARAMETERS; LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; PARAMETRIC MODELS; QUANTITY OF INTEREST; RELATIVE RISKS; RISK PARAMETER; SURVIVAL DATA; UNCERTAINTY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; DATA ANALYSIS; PARAMETRIC TEST; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL;

EID: 4444352607     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00220.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 48, 133-169.
2. Cox, D. R. (1959). The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 21, 411-421.
3. Crowder, M. (1994). Identifiability crises in competing risks. International Statistical Review 62, 379-391.
4. Fisher, L. and Kanarek, P. (1974). Presenting censored data when censoring and survival times may not be independent. Reliability and Biometry: Statistical Analysis of Life-length, F. Proschan and R. J. Serfling (eds), 303-326. Philadelphia: SIAM.
5. Frangakis, C. E. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58, 21-29.
6. Gladman, D. D., Koh, D. R., Urowitz, M. B., and Farewell, V. T. (2000). Lost to follow-up study in SLE. Lupus 9, 363-367.
7. Heckman, J. J. and Honore, B. E. (1989). The identifiability of the competing risks model. Biometrika 76, 325-330.
8. Hogan, J. W. and Laird, N. M. (1997). Model-based approaches to analysing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data. Statistics in Medicine 16, 259-272.
9. Klein, J. P. and Moeschberger, M. L. (1988). Bounds on net survival probabilities for dependent competing risks. Biometrics 44, 529-538.
10. Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical Models and Methods for Life-time Data. New Jersey: Wiley Inter-Science.
11. Link, W. A. (1989). A model for informative censoring. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 749-752.
12. Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1112-1121.
13. Peterson, A. V. (1976). Bounds for a joint distribution function with fixed sub-distributions functions: Applications to competing risks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 73, 11-13.
14. Scharfstein, D. O. and Robins, J. M. (2002). Estimation of the failure time distribution in the presence of informative censoring. Biometrika 89, 617-634.
15. Siannis, F., Copas, J., and Lu, G. (2005). Sensitivity analysis for informative censoring in parametric survival models. Biostatistics.
16. Slud, E. V. and Rubinstein, L. V. (1983). Dependent competing risks and summary survival curves. Biometrika 70, 643-649.
17. Tsiatis, A. (1975). A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 72, 20-22.