Generation of prediction optimal projection on latent factors by a stochastic search algorithm

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 47, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 297-310

  Luebke, Karsten ^a   Weihs, Claus ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chemotaxonomical markers; Design of experiments; Prediction oriented projections; Reduced rank regression; Simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SET THEORY; SIMULATED ANNEALING; THEOREM PROVING;

CHEMOTAXONOMICAL MARKERS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; PREDICTION-ORIENTED PROJECTIONS; REDUCED RANK REGRESSION;

STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 4444337455     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Auling G. Polyamines, biomarker for taxonomy and ecology of phytopathgenic and other bacteria belonging to the proteobacteria. Belg. J. Bot. 125(2):1992;203-209.
2. Belsley D.A., Kuh E., Welsch R.E. Regression Diagnostics. 1980;Wiley, New York.
3. Bohachevsky I.O., Johnson M.E., Stein M.L. Generalized simulated annealing for function optimization. Technometrics. 28(3):1986;209-217.
4. Eddelbüttel D. Object-oriented econometrics. matrix programming in C++ using GCC and Newmat J. Appl. Econom. 11(2):1996;299-314.
5. Frank, I.E., 1989. Comparative Monte Carlo study of biased regression techniques. Technical Report 105, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
6. Frank I.E., Friedman J.H. A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools. Technometrics. 35(2):1993;109-135.
7. Gilli M., Winker P. A global optimization heuristic for estimating agent based models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 42:2003;299-312.
8. Groß, J., Luebke, K., Weihs, C., 2002. A note on the general solution for a projection matrix in latent factor models. Technical Report 28, Sonderforschungsbereich 475, Universität Dortmund.
9. Helland I.S., Alm ø y T. Comparison of prediction methods when only a few components are relevant. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89(426):1994;583-591.
10. Hirashi A., Ueda Y., Ishihara J. Quinone profiling of bacterial communities in natural and synthetic sewage activated sludge for enhanced phosphate removal. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64(3):1998;992-998.
11. Ihaka R., Gentleman R., Robert R. A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 5(3):1996;299-314.
12. Johnson N.L. Bivariate distributions based on simple translation systems. Biometrika. 36:1949;149-176.
13. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd Edition:1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Reinsel G.C., Velu R.P. Multivariate Reduced-Rank Regression, Theory and Applications. 1998;Springer, Berlin.
15. Röhl M.C., Weihs C., Theis W. Direct minimization of error rates in multivariate classification. Comput. Statist. 17:2002;29-46.
16. Schmidli H. Reduced Rank Regression. 1995;Physica Verlag, Wurzburg.
17. Stapleton J.H. Linear Statistical Models. 1995;Wiley, New York.
18. Weihs, C., Hothorn, T., 2002. Determination of optimal prediction oriented multivariate latent factor models using loss functions. Technical Report 15, Sonderforschungsbereich 475, Universität Dortmund.