Personal services in the post-industrial economy: Adding nonprofits to the welfare mix

Social Policy and Administration

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 456-469

  Graefe, Peter ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Job creation; Nonprofit organizations; Personal social services; Post industrial state; Relative price effect

Indexed keywords

NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION; WAGE DETERMINATION; WELFARE PROVISION; WORKING CONDITIONS;

EID: 4444334789     PISSN: 01445596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00401.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Amin, A., Cameron, A. and Hudson, R. (1999), Welfare as work? The potential of the UK social economy, Environment and Planning A, 31, 11: 2033-51.
2. Amin, A., Cameron, A. and Hudson, R. (2002), Placing the Social Economy, London: Routledge.
3. Ascoli, U. and Ranci, C. (2002), The context of new social policies in Europe. In U. Ascoli and C. Ranci, Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
4. Block, F. (1990), Postindustrial Possibilities, Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Broughton, C. (2001), Work programs and welfare recipients: an ethnography of work-based welfare reform, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 45: 17-41.
6. Brush, L. (2002), Changing the subject: gender and welfare regime studies, Social Politics, 9, 2: 161-86.
7. Bucek, J. and Smith, B. (2000), New approaches to local democracy: direct democracy, participation and the "third sector", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18, 1: 3-16.
8. Cameron, C., Mooney, A. and Moss, P. (2002), The child care workforce: current conditions and future directions, Critical Social Policy, 22, 4: 572-95.
9. Cope, M. (2001), Between welfare and work: the role of social service organizations in the social regulation of labor markets and regulation of the poor, Urban Geography, 22, 5: 391-406.
10. Defourny, J., Favreau, L. and Laville, J.-L. (eds) (1998), Insertion et nouvelle économie sociale: Un bilan international, Paris: Desclé de Brouwer.
11. Delp, L. and Quan, K. (2002), Homecare worker organizing in California: an analysis of a successful strategy, Labor Studies Journal, 27, 1: 1-23.
12. Demoustier, D. (1998), France: Des structures diversifiés à la croisée des chemins. In Defourny, Favreau and Laville (1998).
13. Dobrowolsky, A. and Saint-Martin, D. (2002), Agency, actors and change in a child-focused future: problematizing path dependency's past and statist parameters. Paper presented to the Canadian Political Science Association's Annual Meetings, Toronto, May.
14. Dufour, P., Boismenu, G. and Noël, A. (2003), L'Aide an conditionnel: La contrepartie dans les mesures envers les personnes sans-emploi en Europe et en Amérique du Nord, Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
15. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (2001), A New Welfare Architecture for Europe. Report submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union.
17. European Commission (1998), The Era of Tailor-made Jobs: Second Report on Local Development and Employment Initiatives, European Commission Working Document, SEC (98) 25.
18. Favreau, L. and Lévesque, B. (1996), Développement économique communautaire. Ȩconomie sociale et intervention, Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
19. Fontan, J.-M. and Shragge, E. (2000), Tendencies, tensions and visions in the social economy. In E. Shragge and J.-M. Fontan, Social Economy: International Debates and Perspectives, Montréal: Black Rose.
20. Freeman, R. and Schettkat, R. (2000), Low wage services: interpreting the US-German difference, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 7611, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
21. Gadrey, J. (2002), La théorie de la régulation a l'épreuve de l'économie de la qualité et du service, Économic et sociétés, série Économie et gestion des Services, 4, 7: 1095-1117.
22. Giarini, O. and Liedtke, P. (2000), Le plein emploi dans l'économie de service: Rapport du Club de Rome, Paris: Economica.
23. Graefe, P. (2002), The social economy and the state: linking ambitions to institutions in Québec, Canada, Policy and Politics, 30, 2: 247-62.
24. Great Britain (2002), Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
25. Hall, M. and Reed, P. (1998), Shifting the burden: how much can government down-load to the non-profit sector? Canadian Public Administration, 41, 1: 1-20.
26. Herzenberg, S., Alic, J. and Wial, H. (1998), New Rules for a New Economy: Employment and Opportunity in Postindustrial America, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27. Howell, D. (2002), Increasing earnings inequality and unemployment in developed countries: markets, institutions and "unified theory", Politics and Society, 30, 2: 193-243.
28. Iversen, T. and Wren, A. (1998), Equality, employment and budgetary restraint: the trilemma of the service economy, World Politics, 50, 4: 507-46.
29. Jenson, J. (2002), Against the current: child care and family policy in Quebec. In S. Michel and R. Mahon, Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, New York: Routledge.
30. Lamoureux, D. (1998), La panacée de l'économie sociale: un placebo pour les femmes. In L. Boivin and M. Fortier, L'économie sociale: L'avenir d'une illusion. Boucherville: Fides.
31. Laville, J.-L. (1994), Services, emploi et socialisation. In B. Eme and J.-L. Laville, Cohésion sociale et emploi, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
32. Lévesque, B. and Mendell, M. (1999), L'économie sociale an Québec: éléments théoriques et empiriques pour le débat et la recherche, Lien Social et Politiques, 41: 105-18.
33. Lewis, J. (2001), The decline of the male breadwinner model: implications for work and care, Social Politics, 8, 2: 152-69.
34. Leys, C. (2001), Market-driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest, London: Verso.
35. Mahon R. (2000), Swedish social democracy: death of a model? Studies in Political Economy, 63: 27-59.
36. Mahon, R. (2001), Theorizing welfare regimes: toward a dialogue? Social Politics, 8, 1: 24-35.
37. Mahon, R. (2002), Gender and welfare state restructuring through the lens of child care. In S. Michel and R. Mahon, Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, New York: Routledge.
38. Merrett, C. (2001), Declining social capital and nonprofit organizations: consequences for small towns after welfare reform, Urban Geography, 22, 5: 407-23.
39. Morris, M., Robinson, J. and Simpson, J. (1999), The Changing Nature of Home Care and Its Impact on Women's Vulnerability to Poverty, Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
40. Nagar, R., Lawson, V., McDowell, L. and Hanson, S. (2002), Locating globalization: feminist (re)readings of the subjects and spaces of globalization, Economic Geography, 78, 3: 257-84.
41. O'Connor, J., Orloff, A. and Shaver, S. (1999), States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Pérotin, V. (2001), The voluntary sector, job creation and social policy: illusions and opportunities, International Labour Review, 140, 3: 327-62.
43. Phillips, S. and Laforest, R. (2001), Repenser les relations entre gouvernement et secteur bénévole: à la croisée des chemins au Québec et au Canada, Politiques et Sociétés, 20, 2-3: 37-68.
44. Popple, K. and Redmond, M. (2000), Community development and the voluntary sector in the new millennium: the implications of the Third Way in the UK, Community Development Journal, 35, 4: 391-400.
45. Preston, A. (1994), Women in the nonprofit labor market. In T. Odendahl and M. O'Neill, Women and Power in the Nonprofit Sector, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Quebec (2003), Prioriser l'emploi et la solidarité: Plan d'action pour le développement des entreprises d'économie sociale, Québec: Ministère des finances.
47. Ranci, C. (2002), The mixed economy of care in Europe. In U. Ascoli and C. Ranci, Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
48. Scharpf, F. (1997), Employment and the welfare state: a continental dilemma, MPIfG Working Paper, no. 97/7, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies.
49. Shragge, E. (1997), Workfare: an overview. In E. Shragge, Workfare: Ideology for a New Underclass. Toronto: Garamond.
50. Steinberg, R. and Jacobs, J. (1994), Pay equity in nonprofit organizations: making women's work visible. In T. Odendahl and M. O'Neill, Women and Power in the Nonprofit Sector, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Weisbrod, B. (1998), The nonprofit mission and its financing: growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. In B. A. Weisbrod, To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. White, D. (2001), Formalizing relations between states and voluntary sectors: a comparison of national partnership agreements. Paper presented at the RC 19 meeting of the ISA, Oviedo, Spain, September.
53. WRC Social and Economic Consultants Ltd (1999), Social Enterprises and the Social Economy: Case Studies from the EMPLOYMENT Initiative in Ireland, Dublin: WRC.