Search theory and commuting behavior

Growth and Change

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 391-418

  Rouwendal, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; JOB SEARCH; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN ECONOMY; WAGE DETERMINATION;

EID: 4444327328     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00254.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Burdett, K., and D.T. Mortensen. 1998. Wage differentials, employer size and unemployment. International Economic Review 39: 257-273.
2. Clark, W.A.V., Y. Huang, and S. Whithers. 2003. Does commuting distance matter? Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33: 199-221.
3. Fujita, M. 1989. Urban economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Getis, A. 1969. Residential location and the journey from work. Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers 1: 55-59.
5. Gillen, W.J., and A. Guccione. 1993. Search and Fetter's law of markets. Geographical Analysis 25: 165-170.
6. Gordon, P., H.W. Richardson, and M.-J. Jun. 1991. The commuting paradox: Evidence from the top twenty. Journal of the American Planning Association 57: 416-420.
7. Gordon, P., and H.L. Wong, 1985. The cost of urban sprawl: Some new evidence. Environment and Planning A 17: 661-666.
8. Gunn, H. 2001. Spatial and temporal transferability of relationships between travel demand, trip cost and travel time. Transportation Research E 37: 163-189.
9. Hamilton, B.W. 1982. Wasteful commuting. Journal of Political Economy 90: 1035-1053.
10. Harwitz, M., B. Lentnek, P. Rogerson, and T.E. Smith. 1998. Optimal search on spatial paths with recall, thoeretical foundations and computational procedures and examples. Papers in Regional Science 77: 301-327.
11. Levinson, D.M., and A. Kumar. 1994. The rational locator: Why travel times have remained stable. Journal of the American Planning Association 61: 458-469.
12. Maier, G. 1993. The spatial search problem: Structure and complexity. Geographical Analysis 25: 242-251.
13. Miller, H.J. 1993. Modelling strategies for the spatial search problem. Papers in Regional Science 72: 63-85.
14. Mills, E.S. 1998. Excess commuting in U.S. metropolitan areas, pp. 72-83 in L. Lundqvist, L.-G. Mattson and T.J. Kim, eds., Network infrastructure and the urban environment. Berlin: Springer.
15. Mills, E.S., and B.W. Hamilton. 1984. Urban economics. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
16. Mokhtarian, P.I., and I. Salomon. 2001. How derived is demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A 35: 695-719.
17. Rouwendal, J. 1998. Search theory, spatial labor markets and commuting. Journal of Urban Economics 43: 1-22.
18. Rouwendal, J. 1999. Spatial job search and commuting distances. Regional Science and Urban Economics 29: 491-517.
19. Rouwendal, J., and P. Rietveld. 1994. Changes in the commuting distances of Dutch households. Urban Studies 31: 1545-1557.
20. Rouwendal, J., and A. van der Vlist. 2002. A dynamic model of commutes, discussion paper 026/3 Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.
21. Simpson, W. 1980. A simultaneous model of workplace and residential location incorporating job search. Journal of Urban Economics 8: 330-349.
22. Simpson, W. 1992. Urban structure and the labour market. Oxford: Clarendon.
23. Stigler, G. 1961. The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy 69: 213-225.
24. Small, K.A., and S. Song. 1992. "Wasteful" commuting: A resolution. Journal of Political Economy 100: 888-898.
25. van Ommeren, J., P. Rietveld, and P. Nijkamp. 1997. Commuting: In search of jobs and residences. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 402-421.
26. Zax, J.S. 1991. Compensation for commutes in labor and housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics 30: 192-207.