Microstructure and velocity of field-driven Ising interfaces moving under a soft stochastic dynamic

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6 2, 2003, Pages

  Rikvold, Per Arne ^a,b   Kolesik, M ^c,d  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Slovakia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BUBBLES (IN FLUIDS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTAL LATTICES; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); INTERFACIAL ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROSTRUCTURE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; VELOCITY;

HARD DYNAMICS; ISING INTERFACES; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 4444321994     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. A.-L. Barabási and H.E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995), and references therein.
2. P. Meakin, Fractals, Scaling, and Growth Far from Equilibrium (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), and references therein.
3. P.A. Rikvold and M. Kolesik, J. Stat. Phys. 100, 377 (2000).
4. P.A. Rikvold and M., Kolesik, J. Phys. A 35, L117 (2002).
5. P.A. Rikvold and M. Kolesik, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066116 (2002).
6. P. Devillard and H. Spohn, Europhys. Lett. 17, 113 (1992).
7. R.A. Ramos, P.A. Rikvold, and M.A. Novotny, Phys. Rev. B 59, 9053 (1999).
8. M.A. Novotny, P.A. Rikvold, M. Kolesik, D.M. Townsley, and R.A. Ramos, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 274, 356 (2000).
9. D.P. Landau and K. Binder, Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
10. J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999), Chap. 7.
11. H. Guo, B. Grossmann, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1262 (1990).
12. M. Kotrla and A.C. Levi, J. Stat. Phys. 64, 579 (1991).
13. A.B. Bortz, M.H. Kalos, and J.L. Lebowitz, J. Comput. Phys. 17, 10 (1975).
14. H. Spohn, J. Stat. Phys. 71, 1081 (1993).
15. M.A. Novotny, Comput. Phys. 9, 46 (1995).
16. W.K. Burton, N. Cabrera, and F.C. Frank, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 243, 299 (1951).
17. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
18. Each simulation run for a specific set of values of all parameters took about 80 min on an AMD Athlon PC running Linux.
19. J. Krug and H. Spohn, Europhys. Lett. 8, 219 (1989).
20. J. Kertész and D. E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2571 (1989).
21. P. Meakin, P. Ramanlal, L.M. Sander, and R.C. Ball, Phys. Rev. A 34, 5091 (1986).
22. M. Plischke, Z. Rácz, and D. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 35, 3485 (1987).
23. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
24. J. Neergaard and M. den Nijs, J. Phys. A 30, 1935 (1997).
25. O. Pierre-Louis, M.R. D'Orsogna, and T.L. Einstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3661 (1999).
26. G. Korniss, Z. Toroczkai, M.A. Novotny, and P.A. Rikvold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1351 (2000).