|
|
Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1693-1698
|
|
Comparison of various pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil secondary to pseudoexfoliation
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);
MYDRIATIC AGENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BLEEDING;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IMPLANTATION;
INSTRUMENTATION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD;
MALE;
MYDRIASIS;
OPERATION DURATION;
PHACOEMULSIFICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
PSEUDOEXFOLIATION;
PUPIL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SPHINCTER PUPILLAE MUSCLE;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
CAPSULORHEXIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DRUG EFFECT;
ECONOMICS;
EXFOLIATION SYNDROME;
LENS IMPLANTATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
OPHTHALMOLOGY;
PUPIL DISEASE;
VISUAL ACUITY;
AGED;
CAPSULORHEXIS;
EXFOLIATION SYNDROME;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MYDRIATICS;
OPHTHALMOLOGY;
PHACOEMULSIFICATION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
PUPIL;
PUPIL DISORDERS;
VISUAL ACUITY;
|
|
EID: 4444318053
PISSN: 01616420
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.008 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (103)
|
|
References (13)
|
