Application of the IAS theory combining to a three compartiments description of natural organic matter to the adsorption of atrazine or diuron on activated carbon

Environmental Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 763-773

  Baudu, M ^a   Raveau, D ^a   Guibaud, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Atrazine; Competitive adsorption; Diuron; IAST; Natural organic matter

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; UREA;

ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; COMPETITIVE ADSORPTION; DIURON; IAST; IDEAL ADSORBED SOLUTION THEORIES (IAST); NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; PESTICIDE ADSORPTIONS; RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS;

HERBICIDES;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ATRAZINE; DIURON; ORGANIC MATTER; PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; ATRAZINE; LIQUID-SOLID SEPARATION; ORGANIC MATTER;

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; HYPOTHESIS; ISOTHERM; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLLUTANT; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

EID: 4444313173     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2004.9619367     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Newcombe G., Drikas M. and Hayes R., Influence of characterized natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption :I. Characterization of concentrated reservoir water. Water Res., 31, 965-972 (1996).
2. Newcombe G., Drikas M. and Hayes R., Influence of characterized natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption :II. Effect on pore volume distribution and adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol. Water Res., 31, 1065-1073 (1996).
3. Wilmanski K. and Van Breemen A.N., Competitive adsorption of trichloroethylene and humic substances from groundwater on activated carbon. Water Res., 24, 773-779 (1990).
4. Weber W.J. and Smith J.M., Simulation and design models for adsorption process. Environ. Sci. Technol., 21, 1040-1050 (1987).
5. Pelekani C. and Snoeyink V. L., Competitive adsorption in natural water: role of activated carbon pore size, Water Res., 33, 1209-1219 (1999).
6. Qiao S. and Hu X., Effect of micropore size distribution induced heterogeneity on binary adsorption kinetics of hydrocarbon in activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci., 55, 1533-1544 (2000).
7. Ebie K., Li F., Azuma Y., Yuasa A. and Hagishita T., Pore distribution effect of activated carbon in adsorbing organic micropollutants from natural water. Water Res., 35, 167-179 (2001).
8. Bernazeau F., Mandra V ., Charles P., Anselme C. and Bersillon J.L., Pesticides removal on activated carbon: competitive adsorption with natural organic matter. Water Supply, 14, 43 (1996).
9. Myers A.L. and Prausnitz J.M., Thermodynamic of mixed-gas adsorption. Am. Ind. Chem. Eng. J., 11, 121-126 (1965).
10. Radke C.J and Prausnitz J.M., Thermodynamics of multi-solute adsorption from liquid solutions. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 18, 761-768 (1972).
11. Sircar S., Influence of adsorbate size and adsorbent heterogeneity on IAST. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 41, 1135-1145 (1995).
12. Monneyron P, Faur-Brasquet C., Sakoda A., Suzuki M. and Le Cloirec P., Competitive adsorption of organic micropollutants in the aqueous phase onto activated carbon cloth: comparison of the IAS model and neural networks in modeling data. Langmuir, 18, 5163-5169 (2002).
13. Al-Asheh S., Banat F., Al-Omari R. and Duvnjak Z., Predictions of binary sorption isotherms for the sorption of heavy metals by pine bark using single isotherm data. Chemosphere, 41, 659-665 (2000).
14. Porter J.F., Mac Kay G. and Choy K.H., The prediction of sorption from a binary mixture of acidic dyes using single- and mixed-isotherm variants of the ideal adsorbed solute theory. Chem. Eng. Sci., 54, 5863-5885 (1999).
15. Qi S., Snoeyink V.L., Beck E.A., Koffskey W.E. and Lykins B.W., Using isotherms to predict GAC capacity for synthetics organics. J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 84, 113-120 (1992).
16. Baudu M., Le Cloirec P. and Martin G., Modélisation des isothermes d'adsorption sur charbon actif de composés aromatiques en solution aqueuse. Chem. Eng. J., 41, 81-89 (1989).
17. Annesini M.C., Gironi F., Ruzzi M. and Tomei C., Adsorption of organic compounds onto activated carbon. Water Res., 21, 567-571 (1987).
18. Crittenden J.C., Luft P., Hand D.W., Oravitz J.L., Loper S. and Ari M., Prediction of multicomponent adsorption equilibria using ideal adsorbed solution theory. Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1037-1043 (1985).
19. Wang K., Qiao S. and Hu X., Application of IAST in the prediction of multicomponent adsorption equilibrium of gases in heterogeneous solids : micropore size distribution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39, 527-532 (2000).
20. Kilduff J.E, Karanfil T. and Weber W. J. Jr., Competitive interactions among components of humic acids in granular activated carbon adsorption systems: effects of solution chemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 1344-1351 (1996).
21. Knappe D.R.U., Matsui Y., Snoeyink V.L., Roche P., Prados M.J. and Bourbigot M.M., Predicting the capacity of powered activated carbon for trace organic compounds in natural waters., Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 1694-1698 (1998).
22. Gicquel L, Laplanche A. and Wolbert D., Adsorption de l'atrazine par charbon actif en poudre : influence des matières organiques et minerales dissoutes des eaux naturelles. Environ. Technol., 18, 467-478 (1997).
23. Najm I.N., Snoeyink V.L. and Richard Y., Effect of initial S.O.C. concentrations on its activated carbon adsorption capacities in natural water. J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 83, 57-63 (1991).
24. Smith E.H., Bench-scale tests and modeling of adsorption of natural organic matter by activated carbon. Water Res., 28, 1693 (1994).
25. Tien C., Incorporation of the IAS theory in multicomponent adsorption calculations. Chem. Eng. Comm., 40, 265-279 (1986).
26. Fritz W. and Schlunder E.U., Competitive adsorption of two dissolved organics onto activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 721-773 (1981).
27. Smith E.H., Evaluation of multicomponent adsorption equilibria for organic mixtures onto activated Carbon. Water Res., 25, 125-134 (1991).
28. Van Vliet B.M., Weber W.J. and Hosumi H., Modeling and prediction of specific compounds adsorption by activated carbon and synthetic adsorbents. Water Res., 14, 1719-1728 (1980).
29. Thacker W., Crittenden J.C. and Snoeyink V.L., Modelling of adsorber performance : variable influent concentration and comparison of adsorbents, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 56, 243-250 (1984).
30. Sorial G.A., Suidan M.T., Vidic R.D. and Brenner R.C., Effect of GAC characteristics on adsorption of organic polluants. Water Environ. Res., 65, 53-57 (1992).
31. Frick B.R., Bartz R., Sontheimer H. and Digiano F.A., Predicting competitive adsorption effects in granular activated carbon filters. In: Activated Carbon Adsorption of Organics from the Aqueous Phase, Vol 1, M. J. Mc Guire and I. H. Suffet, (eds.) Ann Arbor Science, Boca Raton, FL., USA. (1980).
32. Frick B.R. and Sontheimer H., Adsorption equilibria in multisolute mixtures of known and unknown composition. Treatment of water by granular activated carbon, Advances in Chemistry Series, Vol 202, M. J. Mc Guire and I. H. Suffet, (eds.) Am. Chem. Soc. New York, USA (1983).
33. Kilduff J.E. and Wigton A., Sorption of TCE by humic preloaded activated carbon : incorporating size exclusion and pore blockage phenomena in a competitive adsorption model. Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 250-256 (1999).
34. Julien F., Baudu M. and Mazet M., Relationships between chemical surface state and some physical activated carbon property. Water Res., 32, 3414-3424 (1998).