Narrative and coherence

Mind and Language

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 409-427

  Currie, Gregory ^a,b   Jureidini, Jon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444307115     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00266.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Atran, S. 1994: Core domains versus scientific theories: evidence from systematics and Itza-Maya folk biology. In L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atran, S. 1995: Causal constraints on categories. In D. Sperber, D. Premack and A.J. Premack (eds.), Causal Cognition: a Multi-disciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Atran, S 2002: In Gods we Trust. The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Atran, S and Norenzayan, A. in press Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
5. Barrett, J. and Keil, F. 1996: Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219-247.
6. Barrett, J. 1998: Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608-619.
7. Bering, J. 2002: Intuitive conceptions of dead agents' minds: the natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 263-308.
8. Booth, W. 1961: The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bowler, D.M. and Thommen, E. 2000: Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism, 4, 147-171.
10. Boyer, P. 2001: Religion Explained. London: Heinemann.
11. Currie, G. and I. Ravenscroft 2002: Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
12. Currie, G. and Jureidini, J. 2003: Art and delusion. Monist, 86, pp. 556-578.
13. Currie, G. in preparation: Narrative, narrativity and representation.
14. Fludernik, M. 1996: Towards a 'Natural' Natural Narratology. London: Routledge.
15. Fodor, J. 1983: The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books.
16. Gendler, T.S. 2000: The puzzle of imaginative resistance. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 55-81.
17. Gendler, T.S. 2003: On the relation between pretense and belief. In M. Kieran and D. Lopes (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge.
18. Genette, G. 1988: Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19. Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., and Biró, S. 1995: Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.
20. Goodman, N. 1981: Twisted tales; story, study and symphony. In W.J.T. Mitchell (ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Harris, P.L., Brown, E., Marriott, C., Whittall, S., and Harmer, S. 1991: Monsters, ghosts, and witches: Testing the limits of the fantasy-reality distinction in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 105-123.
22. Harris, P. 2000: The Work of the Imagination. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. Heider, F. and Simmel, M. 1944: An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
24. Humphrey, N. 2002: The Mind Made Flesh. Frontiers of Psychology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University press.
25. Hurley, S. 2003: Making sense of animals: interpretation vs architecture. Mind & Language, 18, 273-280.
26. Johnson, S.C. 2003: Detecting Agents. In C. Frith and D. Wolpert (eds.), The Neuroscience of Social Interaction. London: Royal Society.
27. Keil, F.C. 1992: The origins of an autonomous biology. In M.R. Gunnar, and M. Maratsos (Vol. eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 25. Modularity and constraints in language and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Kelemen, D. 1999a: Beliefs about purpose: on the origins of teleological thought. In M. Corballis and S. Lea (eds.), The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Kelemen, D. 1999b: The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241-272.
30. Kelemen, D. 1999c: Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440-1453.
31. Kelemen, D 2003: British and American children's preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world, Cognition, 88, 201-221.
32. Klin, A. 2000: Imputing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the social attribution task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 831-846.
33. Nemeroff, C. 1995: Magical thinking about illness virulence: conceptions of germs from 'safe' versus 'dangerous' others. Health Psychology, 14(2), 147-151.
34. Nemeroff, C. and Rozin, P. 2000: The making of the magical mind. The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson and P. Harris (eds.), Imagining the Impossible. Magical, Scientific and Religious Thinking in Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Prince, G. 1999: Revisiting narrativity. In W. Grünzweig and A. Solbach (eds.), Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
36. Pylyshyn, Z. 1981: The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (ed.), Imagery. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
37. Pylyshyn, Z. 1984: Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
38. Pylyshyn, Z. 1999: Is perception continuous with cognition? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-65.
39. Rozin, P., Millman, L. and Nemeroff, L. 1986: Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703-712.
40. Rozin, P., Markwith, M. and Ross, B. 1990: The sympathetic magical law of similarity, nominal realism, and neglect of negatives in response to negative labels. Psychological Science, 1, 383-384.
41. Ryle, G. 1949: The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
42. Sarbin, T. 2002: Believed-in imaginings: a narrative approach. In J. de Rivera and T. Sarbin (eds.), Believed-In Imaginings: The Narrative Construction of Reality. Washington: America Psychological Association.
43. Sperber, D. forthcoming: Seedless grapes: nature and culture. In S. Laurence and E. Margolin (eds.), Creations of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995: Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Stein, R.I. and Nemeroff, C.J. 1995: Moral overtones of food: Judgments of others based on what they eat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 480-490.
46. Thomasson, A., forthcoming: Artifacts and other human creations. In S. Laurence and E. Margolin (eds.), Creations of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. 2001: Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance, 30, 6-27.
48. Turner, M. 2003: Double-scope stories. In D. Herman (ed.), Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
49. Velleman, J.D. 2000: The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Vermazen, B. 1986: Expression as expression. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 67, 196-224.
51. Walton, K. 1990: Mimesis as Make-believe. On the Foundation of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
52. White, H. 1981: The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In W.J.T. Mitchell (ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Yacobi, T. 1981: Fictional reliability as a communicative problem. Poetics Today, 2, 113-126.