Comparison of classifiers of remote-sensing data for land-use/land-cover mapping

Current Science

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 328-335

  Dwivedi, R S ^a   Kandrika, Sreenivas ^a   Ramana, K V ^a  

^a NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING AGENCY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444306399     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hubert-Moy, L., Cotonnec, A., Le Du, L., Chardin, A. and Perez, P., A comparison of parametric classification procedures of remotely sensed data applied on different landscape units. Remote Sensing Environ., 2001, 75, 174-187.
2. Strahler, A. H., The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ., 1980, 10, 135-163.
3. Duda, R. O. and Hart, P. E., Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1973.
4. Devijver, P. and Kittler, J., Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach, Prentice Hall, London, 1982.
5. Vapnick, V. N., Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, 1998.
6. Bishop, C., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
7. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C., Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1984.
8. Geman, S. and Geman, D., Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intelligence, 1984, 6, 721-741.
9. Besag, J., On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1986, 48, 259-302.
10. Chellappa, R. and Jain, A. K. (eds), Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, Boston, 1993.
11. Van Deusen, P., Modified highest confidence first classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 1995, 61, 419-425.
12. Schroder, M., Rehrauer, H., Siedel, K. and Datcu, M., Spatial information retrieval from remote-sensing - Part-II: Gibbs-Markhov random fields. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 1998, 36, 1446-1455.
13. Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W., Remote Sensing and Image interpretation, John Wiley, NY, 1979, pp. 469-470.
14. Swain, P. H. and Davis, S. M. (eds), Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
15. Congalton, R., Oderwald, R. and Mead, R., A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photo interpretation. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 1983, 49, 69-74.
16. Congalton, R. G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ., 1991, 37, 35-46.
17. Cohen, J., A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales. Psychol. Meas., 1960, 20, 37-46.
18. Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S. and Holland, P., Discrete Multivariate Analysis Theory and Practices, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975, p. 575.
19. Fung, T. and Ledrew, E., The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indices. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 1988, 54, 1449-1454.
20. Gong, P. and Howarth, P. J., An assessment of some factors influencing multispectral land-cover classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 1990, 56, 597-603.
21. Frizelle, B. G. and Moody, A., Mapping continuous distribution of land-cover: A comparison of maximum-likelihood estimation and artificial neural networks. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 2001, 67, 693-705.
22. Michelson, D. B., Liljeberg, B. M. and Pilesjo, P., Comparison of algorithms for classifying Swedish land-cover using Landsat TM and ERS-1SAR data. Remote Sensing Environ., 2000, 71, 1-15.
23. Hixson, M., Scholz, D., Fuhs, N. and Akiyama, T., Evaluation of several schemes for classification of remotely sensed data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 1980, 46, 1547-1553.