Erratum: Recombination and loss of complementation: A more than twofold cost for parthenogenesis (Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2004) 17 (1084-1097) DOI:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00745.x);Recombination and loss of complementation: A more than two-fold cost for parthenogenesis

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1084-1097

  Archetti, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Asexual reproduction; Automixis; Complementation; Endomitosis; Meiosis; Recombination; Sexual reproduction; Tetraploidy; Triploidy

Indexed keywords

ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

EID: 4444300816     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00784.x     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Archetti, M. 2003. A selfish origin for recombination. J. Theor. Biol. 223: 335-346.
2. Asker, S.E. & Jerling, L. 1992. Apomixis in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
3. van Baarlen, P., van Dijk, P.J., Hoekstra, R.F. & de Jong, J.H. 2000. Meiotic recombination in sexual diploid and apomictic triploid dandelions (Taraxacum officinale L.). Genome 43: 827-835.
4. Barton, N.H. & Charlesworth, B. 1998. Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986-1990.
5. Bell, G. 1982. The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. CroomHelm, London.
6. Bernstein, H., Hopf, F.A. & Michod, R.E. 1988. Is meiotic recombination an adaptation for repairing DNA, producing genetic variation or both. In: The Evolution of Sex (R. E. Michod & B. R Levin, eds), pp. 139-160. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
7. Bicknell, R.A. 1997. Isolation of a diploid, apomictic plant of Hieracium aurantiacum. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10: 168-172.
8. Bicknell, R.A., Borst, N.K. & Koltunow, A.M. 2000. Monogenic inheritance of apomixis in two Hieracium species with distinct developmental mechanisms. Heredity 84: 228-237.
9. Bremermann, H.J. 1980. Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host-pathogen interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 87: 671-702.
10. Burger, R. 1999. Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments. Genetics 153: 1055-1069.
11. Burt, A. 2000. Perspective: sex, recombination and the efficacy of selection - was Weismann right? Evolution 54: 337-351.
12. Burton, T.L. & Husband, B.C. 2000. Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution 54: 1182-1191.
13. Charlesworth, B. 1990. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55: 199-221.
14. Cuellar, O. 1974. The origin of parthenogenesis in vertebrates: the cytogenetic factors. Am. Nat. 108: 625-648.
15. Darlington, C.D. 1937. Recent Advances in Cytology. Sc. Edd. Churchill, London.
16. Darlington, C.D. & Mather, K. 1952. The Elements of Genetics, pp. 265-268. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.
17. Hamilton, W.D. 1982. Sex versus nonsex versus parasite. Oikos, 35: 282-290.
18. Hamilton, W.D. 1993. Haploid dynamic polymorphism in a host with matching parasites: effects of mutation/subdivision, linkage and patterns of selection. J. Hered. 84: 328-338.
19. Hamilton, W.D., Axelrod, R. & Tanese, R. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87: 3566-3573.
20. Jaenike, J. 1978. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theory 3: 191-194.
21. Kojima, A. & Nagato, Y. 1997. Discovery of highly apomictic and highly amphimictic dihaploids in Allium tuberosum. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10: 8-12.
22. Kondrashov, A.S. 1982. Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. Genetical Research 40: 325-332.
23. Kondrashov, A.S. 1988. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-441.
24. Kondrashov, A.S. 1993. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J. Hered. 84: 372-387.
25. Kondrashov, A.S. 1994. Sex and deleterious mutations. Nature 369: 99-100.
26. Kondrashov, A.S. 1997. Evolutionary genetics of life cycles. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sist. 28: 391-435.
27. Lewis, W.M. 1987. The cost of sex. In: The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences (S. C. Stearns, ed.), pp. 33-57. BirkhauserVerlag, Basel.
28. Loidl, J. 1995. Meiotic chromosome pairing in triploid and tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139: 1511-1520.
29. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
30. Lynch, M., Burger, R., Butcher, D. & Gabriel, W. 1993. The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J. Hered. 84: 339-344.
31. Maynard-Smith, J. 1971. What use is sex? J. Theor. Biol. 30: 319-335.
32. Maynard-Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Nogler, G.A. 1982. How to obtain diploid apomictic Ranunculus auricomus plants not found in the wild status. Bot. Helv. 92: 13-22.
34. Nur, U. 1971. Parthenogenesis in coccids (Homoptera). Am. Zool. 11: 301-308.
35. Otto, S.P. & Lenormand, T. 2002; Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 252-261.
36. Parker, E.D. Jr & Selander, R.K. 1976. The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Genetics 84: 791-805.
37. Seger, J. & Hamilton, W.D. 1988. Parasites and sex. In: The Evolution of Sex (R. E. Michod & B. R. Levin, eds), pp. 176-193. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
38. Stern, C. 1936. Somatic crossing over and segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 21: 625-730.
39. Vrijenhoek, R., Dawley, R. Cole, C & Bogart, J. 1989. A list of known unisexual vertebrates. In: Evolution and Cytology of Unisexual vertebrates (R. Dawley & J. Bogart, eds), pp. 19-23. Univ. State of New York, New York.
40. West, S.A., Lively, C.M. & Read, A.F. 1999. A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1003-1013.
41. Williams, C.G. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton USA.