|
|
|
Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 313-371
|
|
Dissing disclosure: just what the doctor ordered.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CANTERBURY V. SPENCE;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH INSURANCE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
UNITED STATES;
CANTERBURY V. SPENCE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
DISCLOSURE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS;
PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLANS;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 4444300572
PISSN: 0004153X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (9)
|
|
References (0)
|
