Response to selection and genetic drift in three populations derived from the golden glow maize population

Crop Science

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1527-1534

  Butruille, David V ^a   Silva, Heyder D ^b   Kaeppler, Shawn M ^c   Coors, James G ^c  

^a MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; ZEA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 4444299880     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1527     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Comstock, R.E., H.F. Robinson, and P.H. Harvey. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 41:360-367.
2. Coors, J.G. 1999. Selection methodology and heterosis. In J.G. Coors et al. (ed.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops: Proceedings of an International CIMMYT symposium. ASA, CSSA, SSSA. Madison, WI.
3. de Leon, N., and J.G. Coors. 2002. Twenty-four cycles of mass selection for prolificacy in the Golden Glow maize population. Crop Sci. 42:325-333.
4. Hallauer, A.R. 1985. Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their applications. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3:1-33.
5. Keratinijakal, J.F., and K.R. Lamkey. 1993a. Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:73-77.
6. Keratinijakal, J.F., and K.R. Lamkey. 1993b. Genetic effects associated with reciprocal recurrent selection in BSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:78-82.
7. Kidwell, K.K., and T.C. Osborn. 1992. Simple plant DNA isolation procedures, p. 1-13. In J. Beckman and T.C. Osborn (ed.) Plant genomes: Methods for genetic and physical mapping. Kluwer Academics Publishers Group AH, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
8. Labate, J.A., K.R. Lamkey, K.R., Lee, M. and W.L. Woodman. 1997. Molecular genetic diversity after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 37:416-423.
9. Labate, J.A., Lamkey, M. Lee, and W.L. Woodman. 1999. Temporal changes in allele frequencies in two reciprocally selected maize populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:1166-1178.
10. Maita, R., and J.G. Coors. 1996. Twenty cycles of biparental mass selection for prolificacy in the open-pollinated maize population Golden Glow. Crop Sci. 36:1527-1532.
11. Mellersch, C., and J. Sampson. 1993. Simplifying detection of microsatellite length polymorphism. Biotechniques 15:582-584.
12. Moore, R.A., and H.W. Albertz. 1924. Pedigreed crops pay. Wisc. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 170.
13. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3321-3323.
14. Penny, L.H., and S.A Eberhart. 1971. Twenty years of reciprocal recurrent selection with two synthetic varieties of maize (Zea mays L.) Crop Sci. 11:900-903.
15. SAS Institute. 2001. SAS user's guide. Version 8. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
16. Schnicker, BJ., and K.R. Lamkey. 1993. Interpopulation genetic variance after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:90-95.
17. Smith, O.S. 1979. A model for evaluating progress from recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 19:223-226.
18. Tracy, W.F., M.A. Chandler, and J.G. Coors. 2003. Historical and biological bases of the concept of heterotic groups. In Agronomy abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI.
19. Yeh, F.C., and T.J.B. Boyle. 1997. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belgian J. Bot. 129:157.