Three-way component analysis of interval-valued data

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 253-264

  Giordani, Paolo ^a   Kiers, Henk A L ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Air pollution data; CANDECOMP PARAFAC; Interval valued data sets; Principal Component Analysis; Tucker3

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION;

AIR POLLUTION DATA; CANDECOMP/PARAFAC; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; COMPONENT CENTERS; DATA SET; INTERVAL-VALUED DATA; INTERVAL-VALUED DATA SET; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TUCKER3; TWO WAYS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CENTERS PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; CHEMOMETRICS; DATA ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE WAY CENTERS PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; THREE WAY COMPONENT ANALYSIS; THREE WAY VERTICES PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 4444296331     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.868     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bock HH, Diday E. Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer: Heidelberg, 2000.
2. Cazes P, Chouakria A, Diday E, Schektman Y. Extension de l'analyse en composantes principales à des données de type intervalle. Rev. Statist. Appl. 1997; 45: 5-24.
3. Tucker LR. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966; 31: 279-311.
4. Carroll JD, Chang JJ. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of 'Eckart-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika 1970; 35: 283-319.
5. Harshman RA. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an 'exploratory' multimode factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 1970; 16: 1-84.
6. Kiers HAL. Hierarchical relations among three-way methods. Psychometrika 1991; 56: 449-470.
7. Kroonenberg PM. Three-mode Principal Component Analysis: Theory and Applications. DSWO Press: Leiden, 1983.
8. Kiers HAL, Van Mechelen I. Three-way component analysis: principles and illustrative application. Psychol. Methods 2001; 6: 84-110.
9. Harshman RA, Lundy ME. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Law HG, Snyder CW, Hattie JA, McDonald RP (eds). Praeger: New York, 1984; 602-642.
10. Bro R, Smilde AK. Centering and scaling in component analysis. J. Chemometrics 2003; 17: 16-33.
11. Kroonenberg PM, de Leeuw J. Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 1980; 45: 69-97.
12. Andersson CA, Bro R. Improving the speed of multiway algorithms. Part I: Tucker3. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 42: 93-103.
13. Kiers HAL. Recent developments in three-mode factor analysis: constrained three-mode factor analysis and core rotations. In Data Science, Classification and Related Methods, Hayashi C, Ohsumi N, Yajima K, Tanaka Y, Bock HH, Baba Y (eds). Springer-Verlag: Tokyo, 1998; 563-574.
14. Kiers HAL. Some procedures for displaying results from three-way methods. J. Chemometrics 2000; 14: 151-170.
15. Appellof CJ, Davidson ER. Strategies for analyzing data from video fluorometric monitoring of liquid chromatographic effluents. Anal. Chem. 1981; 53: 2053-2056.
16. Kiers HAL, Krijnen WP. An efficient algorithm for PARAFAC of three-way data with large numbers of observation units. Psychometrika 1991; 56: 147-152.
17. Kiers HAL, Kroonenberg PM, ten Berge JMF. An efficient algorithm for TUCKALS3 with large numbers of observation units. Psychometrika 1992; 57: 415-422.
18. Alsberg BK, Kvalheim OM. Speed improvement of multivariate algorithms by the postponing of basis matrix multiplication method. Part I. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994; 24: 31-42.
19. Alsberg BK, Kvalheim OM. Speed improvement of multivariate algorithms by the postponing of basis matrix multiplication method. Part II. Three-mode principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994; 24: 43-54.
20. Bro R, Andersson CA. Improving the speed of multiway algorithms. Part II: Compression. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 42: 105-113.
21. Kiers HAL, Harshman RA. Relating two proposed methods for speedup of algorithms for fitting two- and three-way principal component and related multilinear models. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997; 36: 31-40.
22. Carroll JD, Pruzansky S, Kruskal JB. CANDELINC: a general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters. Psychometrika 1980; 45: 3-24.
23. Kiers HAL. Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis. J. Chemometrics 2000; 14: 105-122.
24. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958; 23: 187-200.
25. Andersson CA, Bro R. The N-way toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000; 52: 1-4.
26. Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press: New York, 1980.
27. Zimmermann HJ. Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, 2001.
28. Giordani P, Kiers HAL. Principal component analysis of symmetric fuzzy data. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2004; 45: 519-548.