Evaluating AHRD research using a feminist research framework

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-26

  Bierema, Laura L ^a   Cseh, Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444293694     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1047     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women's Studies International Forum, 6 (4), 423–435.
2. Arnold, D. E. (1996). An exploration of the type of research appearing in the AHRD conference proceedings. In E. F. Holton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 817–821.
3. Beck, B. (1998). Women and work: A gentle invasion. Economist, 348 (8077), S6–S9.
4. Becker, E. (2002, Jan. 24). Study finds a growing gap between managerial salaries for men and women. New York Times, p. A22.
5. Bierema, L. L. (1998a). A feminist approach to HRD research. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Oak Brook, IL, 1998, pp. 293–300.
6. Bierema, L. L. (1998b). A feminist critique of human resource development research. Proceedings of the Adult Education Research conference, San Antonio, Tex., pp. 31–36.
7. Biswas, R., and Dick, P. (1996). Diversity and development: An assessment of equal opportunities and the role of HRD in the police service. In E. F. Holton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 627–633.
8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998). National compensation survey: Occupational wages in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
9. Catalyst. (1997). Women of color in corporate management: A statistical picture. New York: Catalyst.
10. Conduit, D. M., & Hutchinson, J. R. (1997). Women in public administration: Extending the metaphor of the emperor's new clothes. American Review of Public Administration, 27 (2), 181–197.
11. DeVault, M. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29–50.
12. Dobosz, A. M. (1999/2000). Women on the verge of 2000. Ms. X, 1, 20–23.
13. Fernandez, J. (1999). Race, gender and rhetoric: The true state of race and gender relations in corporate America. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Fine, M. (1985). Reflections on a feminist psychology of women: Paradoxes and prospects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 167–183.
15. Hardy, C. R. (1999). A discussion of the methodological appropriateness of research represented in the AHRD Proceedings: A strategic perspective for journey management. In K. P. Kuchinke (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Arlington, VA, 1999, pp. 880–887.
16. Hite, L. M., and McDonald, K. S. (1999). Questioning the viability of a women's network as a management development activity. In K. P. Kuchinke (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Arlington, VA, 1999, pp. 1, 055–1, 060.
17. Hixon, J. A., & McClernon, T. R. (1999). The status of HRD research literature in 1997. In K. P. Kuchinke (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Arlington, VA, 1999, pp. 897–902.
18. Hultin, M., & Szulkin, R. (1999). Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (3), 453–472.
19. Jacobs, R. L. (1990). Human resource development is an interdisciplinary body of knowledge. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1 (1), 65–71.
20. Knoke, D., & Ishio, Y. (1998). The gender gap in company training. Work and Occupations, 25 (2), 141–167.
21. Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
22. Korten, D. C. (1998). Globalizing civil society: Reclaiming our right to power. New York: Seven Stories Press.
23. Leimbach, M. P., & Baldwin, T. T. (1997). How research contributes to the HRD value chain. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook: Linking research and practice (pp. 21–46). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Lykes, M. B., & Stewart, A. J. (1986). Evaluating the feminist challenge to research in personality and social psychology: 1963–1983. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 393–412.
26. McDonald, K. S., and Hite, L. M. (1996). HRD initiatives contributing to women's career progress. In E. F. Holton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 647–653.
27. Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2000). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, 78 (1), 126–138.
28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Patai, D. (1991). U.S. academics and third world women: Is ethical research possible? In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 137–153). New York: Routledge.
30. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Pritchard, S. M. (1994, June). Backlash, backwater, or back to the drawing board? Feminist thinking and librarianship in the 1990s. Wilson Library Bulletin, 68, 42–46.
32. Rowney, J.I.A., & Cahoon, A. R. (1990). Individual and organizational characteristics of women in managerial leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 9 (4–5), 293–316.
33. Sleezer, C. M., & Sleezer, J. H. (1998). The status of HRD research in the United States from 1980 to 1994: Process and results. Human Resource Development International, 1 (4), 451–464.
34. Sleezer, M. C., Sleezer, J. H., & Pace, W. R. (1996). Identifying core journals for HRD research: Process and results. In E. F. Holton (ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 822–827.
35. Stokes, V. (1996). A case study of African-American women's corporate leadership experiences: Contextual implications for human resource development. In E. F. Holton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 620–626.
36. Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8 (1), 9–32.
37. VanBuren, M. E., and Erskine, W. (2002). State of the industry: ASTD's annual review of trends in employer-provided training in the United States (No. 190202). Alexandria, VA: American Society of Training and Development.
38. van Hooff, N. M., & Mulder, M. (1997). The analysis of conference proceedings for the Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD) 1996: A review. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development annual conference, 1997, Atlanta, GA, pp. 178–185.
39. Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Worell, J. (1996). Opening doors to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 469–485.
41. Worell, J., & Etaugh, C. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 443–450.