Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 82, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 212-216

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; CONCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; DONOR; GAMETE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IDENTITY; INFORMATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; RECIPIENT; REVIEW;

EID: 4444291751     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. McGee G., Brakman S.-V., Gurmankin A.D. Gamete donation and anonymity disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;2033-2038
2. Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;818-824
3. McWhinnie A.M. Children from assisted reproductive technology the psychological issues and ethical dilemmas. Early Child Devel Care. 163:2000;13-23
4. Hahn S.J., Craft-Rosenberg M. The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs. JOGNN. 31:2002;283-293
5. Snowden R. The family and arti cial reproduction. Bromham D.R., Dalton M.E., Jackson J.C. Philosophical ethics in reproductive medicine. 1990;70-78 Manchester University Press, Manchester
6. Lifton B.J. Journey of the adopted self: a quest for wholeness. 1994;Basic Books, New York
7. Brodzinsky D.M., Smith D.W., Brodzinsky A.B. Children's adjustment to adoption: developmental and clinical issues. 1998;Sage Publications, London
8. Rumball A., Adair V. Telling the story parents' scripts for donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 14:1999;1392-1399
9. New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Assisted reproductive technologies: analysis and recommendations for policy. 1998;Health Education Service, Albany, N.Y.
10. Golombok S., Brewaeys A., Giavazzi M.T., Guerra D., MacCallum F., Rust J. The European study of assisted reproduction families the transition to adolescence. Hum Reprod. 17:2002;830-840
11. Turner A.J., Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod. 15:2000;2041-2051
12. McWhinnie A. Gamete donation and anonymity should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod. 16:2001;807-817
13. Pruett K.D. Strange bedfellows? Reproductive technology and child development. Infant Ment Health J. 13:1992;312-318
14. Golombok S. New families, old values considerations regarding the welfare of the child. Hum Reprod. 13:1999;2342-2347
15. Amuzu B., Laxova R., Shapiro S.S. Pregnancy outcome, health of children, and family adjustment after donor insemination. Obstet Gynecol. 75:1990;899-905
16. Klock S.C., Maier D. Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fertil Steril. 56:1991;489-495
17. Klock S.C., Jacob M.C., Maier D. A prospective study of donor insemination recipients secrecy, privacy, and disclosure. Fertil Steril. 62:1994;477-484
18. Cook R., Golombok S., Bish A., Murray C. Disclosure of donor insemination parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsych. 65:1995;549-559
19. Nachtigall R.D., Becker G., Quiroga S.S., Tschann J.M. The disclosure decision concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 178:1998;1165-1170
20. Nachtigall R.D., Tschann J.M., Quiroga S.S., Pitcher L., Becker L. Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertil Steril. 68:1997;83-89
21. Golombok S., Murray C., Brinsden P., Abdalla H. Social versus biological parenting family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. J Child Psychol Psychiat. 40:1999;519-527
22. Sewall G., Mason L. Parental acceptance, disclosure and decision making amongst recipients in an anonymous donor ooctye program. Fertil Steril. 64:1995;S252-S253
23. Greenfeld D.A., Klock S.C., Rausch D.T. Disclosure patterns in couples who have conceived via oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 78:2002;S27
24. Frith L. Beneath the rhetoric the role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics. 15:2001;473-484
25. Gottlieb C., Lalos O., Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Hum Reprod. 15:2000;2052-2056
26. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. "Donor anonymity." http://www.hfea.gov.uk/PressOfficeBackgroundpapers/ DonorAnonymity visited February 2004
27. Daniels K.R., Lewis G.M., Gillett W. Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception the nature of couples' decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 40:1995;1213-1220
28. Applegarth L., Goldberg N.C., Cholst I., McGoff N., Fantini D., Zellers N., et al. Families created through ovum donation a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment. J Assist Reprod Gen. 12:1995;574-580
29. Mahlstedt P.P., Greenfeld D.A. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril. 52:1989;908-914
30. Patrizio P., Mastroianni A.C., Mastroianni L. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;2036-2038
31. Scheib J.E., Riordan M., Shaver P.R. Choosing between anonymous and identity-release sperm donors recipient and donor characteristics. Reprod Technol. 10:2000;50-58
32. The Sperm Bank of California. http://www.thespermbankofca.org, visited September 2002
33. Lalos A., Daniels K., Gottlieb C., Lalos O. Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 18:2003;212-216
34. Daniels K.R., Lewis G.M., Curson R. Information sharing in semen donation the views of donors. Soc Sci Med. 44:1997;673-680
35. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2002 Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation a practice committee report. Fertil Steril. 77:2002;S1-S16
36. Current Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. E-2.05 Artificial insemination by anonymous donor. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pfnew/pfonline, visited January 2004
37. American Association of Tissue Banks. Standards of tissue banking. 10th ed. 2002. http://www.aatb.org, visited January 2004
38. Garrison M. Law making for baby making an interpretive approach to the determination of legal parentage. Harv L Rev. 113:2000;835-923
39. Chestney E.S. The right to know one's genetic origin can, should, or must a state that extends this right to adoptees extend an analogous right to children conceived with donor gametes? Texas L Rev. 80:2001;365-391
40. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 1993 Guidelines for gamete donation. Fertil Steril. 59:1993;S1-S9
41. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 1998 Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 70:1998;S1-S6
42. Howe D., Feast J. Adoption, search and reunion: the long-term experience of adopted adults. 2000;The Children's Society, London
43. Samuels E.J. The idea of adoption an inquiry into the history of adult adoptee access to birth records. Rutgers L Rev. 53:2001;367-436
44. Oregon Revised Statutes §432.240 (2001)
45. Tennessee Code Annotated §36-1-127 (2001)
46. Andrews L.B., Elster N. Adoption, reproduction technologies, and genetic information. Health Matrix. 8:1998;125-151
47. National Adoption Information Clearing House. http://www.calib.com/naic/ pubs/l_acestb2htm, visited September 2002
48. Annas G.J. Fathers anonymous beyond the best interests of the sperm donor. Family L Q. 14:1980;1-13
49. Daniels K.R., Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Pol Life Sci. 12:1993;155-170