Adoption of laparoscopic technique for radical prostatectomy in a district hospital in Hong Kong

Annals of the College of Surgeons of Hong Kong

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 83-89

  Chan, Steve Wai Hee ^a   Yung, Max Yee Ping ^a   Que, Manuel Bon We ^b   Mah, Ida Soo Fan ^a   Man, Chi Wai ^a  

^a TUEN MUN HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b UNITED CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate; Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Learning curve; Operation time

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; BLEEDING; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HONG KONG; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OPERATION DURATION; PENIS ERECTION; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; URINE INCONTINENCE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 4444284985     PISSN: 10284001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2034.2004.00201.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Schuessler WW, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Vancaille TH. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J. Urol. 1992; 147: 246A.
2. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi L. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854-7.
3. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Monsouris technique. J. Urol. 2000; 163: 1643-9.
4. Thuroff J. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility studies or the future standard technique? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2000; 10: 363-4.
5. Gill I, Zippe C. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 2: 423-36.
6. Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M et al. Radical prostatectomy, a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparscopic approaches. World J. Urol. 2003; 20: 360-6.
7. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 1: 189-202.
8. Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC. Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesico-urethral running anastomosis. J. Endourol. 2003; 17: 481-4.
9. Katz R, Nadu A, Olsson LE et al. A simplified 5-step model for training laparscopic urethro-vesical anastomosis. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 2041-4.
10. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J. Urol. 1991; 146: 278-82.
11. Andriole GL. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: CON. Urology 2001; 58: 506-7.
12. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparosocpic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 1999; 39: 71-5.
13. Abbou CC, Salomon L, HozNek A et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy preliminary results. Urology 2000; 55: 630-4.
14. Jewett MA. Laparosocpic prostatectomy: here to stay. Can. J. Urol. 2002; 9 (Suppl. 1): 14-17.
15. Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H et al. Feasibility and usefulness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Kobe University experience. Int. J. Urol. 2002; 9: 635-40.
16. Dahl DM, L'esperance JO, Jiang Z, Gallagher K. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 70 cases at a U.S. University medical center. Urology 2002; 60: 859-63.
17. Brown JA, Leonard G, Gomella LG et al. Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2003; 62: 481-6.
18. Guillonneau B, El-Fettouh Baumert H, Cathelineau X et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 1261-6.
19. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J. Urol. 2000; 166: 2101-8.
20. Fromont G, Guillonneau B, Validire P, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology 2002; 60: 661-5.
21. Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG et al. Pathological comparison of laparsoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2003; 62: 481-6.
22. Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. J. Urol. 1998; 160: 2428.
23. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J. Urol. 2002; 167: 51-6.
24. Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J. Urol. 2003; 166: 1729-33.
25. Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one centre. Euro. Urol. 2002; 42: 104-11.
26. Arai Y, Egawa S, Terachi T et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multi-istitutional experience in Japan. Int. J. Urol. 2003; 10: 430-4.
27. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 1689-93.
28. Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hozenk A, Chopin D, Abbou C. Radical retropubic versus laparosocpic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003; 62: 292-7.
29. Isao H, Gaku K, Kideaki M, Ichiro N, Shoji H, Hiroshi O, Sadao K. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 2045-8.
30. El-Feel A, Davis JW, Deger S et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 2003; 62: 314-18.
31. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol. 2002; 168: 945-9.