Media and language change: Introduction

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-17

  Herring, Susan C ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444280054     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.4.1.02her     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bach, Ulrich. 1995. Wills and will-making in 16th and 17th century England: Some pragmatic aspects. In: Andreas H. Jucker (ed.). Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 125-144.
2. Bacon, David. 1996. Unions: Organizing Silicon Valley’s High Tech Workers. http://www.igc.org/dbacon/Unions/04hitec0.htm.
3. Baron, Naomi S. 1984. Computer-mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language 18, 118-141.
4. Baron, Naomi S. 2000. Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where It’s Heading. London/New York: Routledge.
5. Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Bell, Allan. 2002. Dateline, deadline: journalism, language and the reshaping of time and place in the millennial world. To appear in James E. Alatis, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Ai-Hui Tan (eds.). Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2000-Linguistics, Language, and the Professions: Education, Journalism, Law, Medicine, and Technology. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
7. Bell, Allan, and Peter Garrett (eds.). 1997. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65, 487-51.
9. Blondheim, Menahem. 1994. News Over the Wires: The Telegraph and the Flow of Public Information in America, 1844-1897. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bugyi-Ollert, Renate. 2000. Verbal turn-taking and picture turn-taking in TV interviews. In: Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), 241-262.
12. Chafe, Wallace L., and Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In: R. Horowitz, and S.J. Samuels (eds.). Comprehending Oral and Written Language. San Diego: Academic Press, 83-113.
13. Cherny, Lynn. 1999. Conversation and Community. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
14. Elliott, Nancy. 2000. A Sociolinguistic Study ofRhoticity in American Film Speech from the 1930s to the 1970s. Ph.D, dissertation, Indiana University Department of Linguistics.
15. Ess, Charles (ed.), with Fay Sudweeks. 2001. Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity.
17. Fairclough, Norman. 1995a. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
18. Fairclough, Norman. 1995b. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
19. Fleischman, Suzanne. 2000. Methodologies and ideologies in historical linguistics: On working with older languages. In: Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.), 33-58.
20. Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
21. Garrett, Peter, and Allan Bell. 1997. Media and discourse: A critical overview. In: Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett (eds.). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-20.
22. Gieszinger, Sabine. 2000. Two hundred years of advertising in The Times: The development of text type markers. In: Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), 85-110.
23. Gold, Ruby. 1991. Answering machine talk. Discourse Processes 14.2, 243-260.
24. Goody, Jack. 1987. The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hale, Constance. 1996. Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age. San Francisco: Hardwired.
26. Herring, Susan C. 1998. Le style du courrier électronique: variabilité et changement. Terminogramme 84-85, 9-16.
27. Herring, Susan C. 1999. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4.4. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/.
28. Herring, Susan C. 2001. Computer-mediated discourse. In: Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton (eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 612-634.
29. Herring, Susan C. (ed.). In press. Computer-Mediated Conversation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30. Herring, Susan C., Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler. 2000a. On textual parameters and older languages. In: Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.), 1-31.
31. Herring, Susan C., Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.). 2000b. Textual Parameters in Older Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Jacquemin, Christian. 2001. Spotting and Discovering Terms Through Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Jucker, Andreas H. 1995. Mass media. In: JefVerschueren, Jan-Ola Ostman, and Jan Blommaert (eds.). Handbook ofPragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-14.
34. Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39, 1123-1134.
35. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
36. Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor, and Donald Ringe. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In: Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.), 353-391.
37. Kyto, Merja. 2000. Robert Keayne’s notebooks: A verbatim record of spoken English in early Boston? In: Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schosler (eds.), 273-308.
38. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39. Liverpool Dock Shop Stewards’ Committee. 1996. Dockers’ Charter no.5: Cyberpickets. http://www.labournet.org/docks/other/CHART5.HTM.
40. Ljung, Magnus. 2000. Newspaper genres and newspaper English. In: Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), 129-150.
41. Morris, Merrill, and Christine Ogan. 1996. The Internet as a mass medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1.4. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue4/morris.html. Reprinted from Journal of Communication 46.1 (1996).
42. Mufwene, Salikoko. 1996. The Founder Principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 12, 83-134.
43. Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizingofthe Word. London: Methuen.
44. O’Sullivan, Patrick. 1999. ‘Personal broadcasting’: Theoretical implications of the Web. http://www.ilstu.edu/˜posull/PersBroad.htm.
45. Pool, Ithiel de Sola (ed.). 1977. The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Rowe, Charley. In press. Whatchanade?: Rapid language change in a private email sibling code. In: Susan C. Herring (ed.).
47. Schmid-Isler, Salome. 2000. The language of digital genres. A semiotic investigation of style and iconology on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 33).IEEE Press. http://www.computer.org/proceedings/hicss/0493/04933/0493toc.htm.
48. Scribner, Sylvia, and Michael Cole. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler. 1991. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. TEI. 2002. Text Encoding Initiative. http://www.tei-c.org/.
52. Ungerer, Friedrich (ed.). 2000. English Media Texts — Past and Present: Language and Textual Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
53. Van de Velde, Hans, Merinel Gerritsen, and Roeland van Hout. 1996. The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch. A real-time study based on radio recordings. Language Variation and Change 8.2, 149-175.
54. van Dijk, Teun. 1990. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.