Quantum computing with atomic Josephson junction arrays

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 4 A, 2003, Pages

  Tian, Lin ^a   Zoller, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC PHYSICS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTRON RESONANCE; ELECTRON TUNNELING; HAMILTONIANS; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PULSED LASER APPLICATIONS; RAMAN SCATTERING; SQUIDS; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION ARRAY; OPTICAL TRAP; QUANTUM COMPUTING; RAMAN COUPLING; RAMAN LASER; SINGLE-QUBIT QUANTUM LOGIC GATE;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4444278500     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).
2. T. P. Orlando and K. A. Delin, Introduction to Applied Superconductivity (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991).
3. A.J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001).
4. D.S. Hall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1543 (1998)
5. S. Inouye et al., Nature (London) 392, 15 (1998)
6. W.M. Liu, W.B. Fan, W.M. Zheng, J.Q. Liang, and S.T. Chui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170408 (2002).
7. J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3164 (1986)
8. I. Zapata, F. Sols, and A.J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. A 57, R28 (1998)
9. J. Ruostekoski et al., ibid. 57, 511 (1998)
10. E.L. Bolda, S.M. Tan, and D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4719 (1997)
11. R. Walser, ibid. 79, 4724 (1997)
12. A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S.R. Shenoy, ibid. 79, 4950 (1997)
13. S. Giovanazzi, A. Smerzi, and S. Fantoni, ibid. 84, 4521 (2000)
14. S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999)
15. J.R. Anglin, P. Drummond, and A. Smerzi, ibid. 64, 063605 (2001)
16. J.R. Anglin and A. Vardi, ibid. 64, 013605 (2001).
17. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001).
18. J.E. Mooij, T.P. Orlando, L. Levitov, Lin Tian, Caspar H. van der Wal, and Seth Lloyd, Science 285, 1036 (1999).
19. T.P. Orlando, J.E. Mooij, Lian Tian, Caspar H. van der Wal, L. Levitov, Seth Lloyd, and J.J. Mazo, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 398 (1999).
20. I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C.J.P.M. Harmans, and J.E. Mooij, Science 299, 1869 (2003).
21. K. Schulze, Diploma thesis, University of Innsbruck, 1999.
22. J.J. García-Ripoll and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 127902 (2003); note that small fluctuation of the number of atoms does not affect our disscussions on the qubit.
23. D.P. DiVincenzo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 769 (2000), special issue on experimental proposals for quantum compution; e-print quant-ph/0002077.
24. Tin-Lun Ho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998).
25. C.K. Law, H. Pu, and N.P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257 (1998).
26. 2 can suppressed by shifting the atomic levels by external fields, so that energy conservation in the collision is violated, i.e., these terms average away in the Hamiltonian. Note that in our numerical calculations, we include this term to count for the exact form of the interaction.
27. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995).
28. F.A. van Abeelen and B.J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. A 59, 578 (1999).
29. E.R.I. Abraham, W.I. McAlexander, J.M. Gerton, R.G. Hulet, R. Cote, and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. A 55, R3299 (1997).
30. B.D. Esry, Chris H. Green, and James P. Burke, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1751 (1999).
31. M.W. Jack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 140402 (2002).
32. A.J. Moerdijk, W.C. Stwalley, R.G. Hulet, and B.J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 40 (1994)
33. A.J. Moerdijk and B.J. Verhaar, ibid. 73, 518 (1994)
34. A.J. Moerdijk, B.J. Verhaar, and A. Axelsson, Phys. Rev. A 51, 4852 (1995).