Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model

Urology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 435-438

  Lukasewycz, Stephen ^a   Hoffman, Nathan ^a   Botnaru, Andrei ^a   Deka, P M ^a   Monga, Manoj ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE; EXTRACTION; FORCE; IN VITRO STUDY; LAVAGE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RECORDING; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STONE ANALYSIS; TIME; URETER; URETER STONE; URETEROSCOPE;

ANIMALS; CATS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MODELS, ANATOMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URETERAL CALCULI; URINARY CATHETERIZATION;

EID: 4444260903     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.063     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ellik M. Stones in the ureter: their extraction by looped catheter. J Urol. 57:1947;473-478
2. Chow G.K., Patterson D.E., Blute M.L., et al. Ureteroscopy effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol. 170:2003;99-102
3. Segura J.W., Preminger G.M., Assimos D.G., et al. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 158:1997;1915-1921
4. El-Gabry E.A., Bagley D.H. Retrieval capabilities of different stone basket designs in vitro. J Endourol. 13:1999;305-307
5. Ptashnyk T., Cueva-Martinez A., Michel M., et al. Comparative investigations of the retrieval capabilities of various baskets in four ex vivo models. Eur Urol. 41:2002;406-410
6. Dormia E. Dormia basket standard technique, observations and general concepts. Urology. 20:1982;437
7. Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK, Monga M: Evaluation of Stone basket configurations. J Endourol 17(suppl): 2003