Experience of model integration and Pareto frontier visualization in the search for preferable water quality strategies

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 243-260

  Lotov, A V ^a   Bourmistrova, L V ^a   Efremov, R V ^a   Bushenkov, V A ^b   Buber, A L ^c   Brainin, N A ^c  

^a RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^c Eng and Res Ctr for Water Mgmt   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Decision screening; DSS; Feasible goals method; Integration of models; Interactive decision maps; Water quality planning

Indexed keywords

PARETO FRONTIER; RIVER BASINS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

WATER QUALITY;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; RIVER BASIN; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY;

EURASIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; VOLGA BASIN;

EID: 4444259612     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berezkin, V., Kamenev, G., Lotov, A., Miettinen, K., 2003. Application of Pareto Frontier Visualization for Analysing Cooling Strategies in Continuous Casting of Steel. Reports of Dept. of Math. Information Technology, N B 8/2003, Jyvaskyla, Finland: University of Jyvaskyla, 22 pp.
2. Cohon J. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. 1978;Academic Press, New York
3. Dorfman R. Formal models in the design of water resource systems. Water Resources Research. 1:(3):1965;329-336
4. Gass S., Saaty T. The computational algorithm for the parametric objective function. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 2:(1):1955;39
5. Haimes Y.V., Tarvainen K., Shima T., Thadathil J. Hierarchical Multiobjective Analysis of Large-Scale Systems. 1990;Hemisphere Publishing, New York
6. Henze M., Oedegaard H. Wastewater treatment process development in Central and Eastern Europe - strategies for a stepwise development involving chemical and biochemical treatment. Remediation and Management of Degraded River Basins, NATO ASI Series. 1995;Springer-Verlag, Berlin
7. Lotov A.V. Integrated Assessment of Environmental Problems. 1994;Computing Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. (in Russian)
8. Lotov A.V. Comment to the Paper by D.J. White "A Characterization of the Feasible Set of Objective Function Vectors in Linear Multiple Objective Problems" European Journal of Operational Research. 89:(1):1996;215-220
9. Lotov A. Computer-based support for planning and negotiation on environmental rehabilitation of water resource systems. Loucks D.P. Rehabilitation of Degraded Rivers: Challenges, Issues and Experiences. 1998;417-445 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
10. Lotov A., Bourmistrova L., Bushenkov V. Efficient strategies. An application in water quality planning. Kersten G., Mikolajuk Z., Rais M., Yeh A. Decision Analysis and Support for Sustainable Development. 1999;145-166 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
11. Lotov A.V., Bushenkov V.A., Kamenev G.K. Feasible Goals Method. Mathematical Basis and Environmental Applications. 1999;Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, NY, USA. (in Russian)
12. Lotov, A., Bourmistrova, L., Bushenkov, V., Efremov, R., Buber, A., Brainin, N., Maksimov, A., 1999c. MIKE11 and Interactive Decision Maps: joint application in DSS for Water Quality Planning. Paper at the 3d DHI Software Conference, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Helsingor, Denmark, June 7-9, 1999. http://www.dhi.dk/softcon/papers/027/027.htm
13. Lotov A., Bushenkov V., Kistanov A., Chernov A. Experimental Internet Resource for Development of Independent Strategies. http://www.ccas.ru/mmes/ mmeda/resource/:2000
14. Lotov A.V., Bushenkov V.A., Chernykh O.L. Multi-criteria DSS for river water quality planning. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering. 12:(1):1997;57-67
15. Lotov A.V., Bushenkov V.A., Kamenev G.K., Chernykh O.L. Computer and Search for Balanced Tradeoff. 1997;Nauka, Moscow. (in Russian)
16. Lotov A.V., Bushenkov V.A., Kamenev G.K. Feasible Goals Method. Search for Smart Decisions. 2001;Computing Center of the RAS, Moscow, Russia. (in English)
17. Lotov A.V., Kamenev G.K., Berezkin V.E. Approximation and visualization of Pareto-efficient frontier for nonconvex multiobjective problems. Doklady of Russian Academy of Sciences. 386:(6):2002;738-741. (in Russian; English translation in: Doklady Mathematics, 66(2), 260-262 (2002))
18. Loucks D.P., Stedinger J.R., Haith D.A. Water Resources Systems Planning and Analysis. 1981;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
19. Louie P.W.F., Yeh W.W.-G., Hsu N.-S. Multiobjective water resources management planning. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 110:(1):1984;39-56
20. Simon H. The New Science of Management Decision. 1960;Harper and Row, New York
21. Yan H., Solomatine D., Velickov S., Abbott M.B. Distributed environmental impact assessment using Internet. Hydroinformatics. 1:(1):1999;59-70