Differences in expression of retinal pigment epithelium mRNA between normal canines

Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 201-207

  Hanik, Heather L J ^a   Loewen, Matthew E ^a   Appleyard, Greg D ^a   Grahn, Bruce H ^a   Forsyth, George W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DOG; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MARKER; HUMAN; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PIGMENT EPITHELIUM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIBLING; SPECIES COMPARISON; SUBTRACTIVE HYBRIDIZATION; SWINE;

ANIMALS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; DOGS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; PEDIGREE; PIGMENT EPITHELIUM OF EYE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REFERENCE VALUES; RNA, MESSENGER;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; GALLUS GALLUS; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 4444256134     PISSN: 08309000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Langston AA, Mellersh CS, Wiegand NA, et al. Toward a framework linkage map of the canine genome. J Hered 1999;90:7-14.
2. Werner P, Raducha MG, Prociuk U, Henthorn PS, Patterson DF. A comparative approach to physical and linkage mapping of genes on canine chromosomes using gene-associated simple sequence repeat polymorphisms illustrated by studies of dog chromosome 9. J Hered 1999;90:39-42.
3. Reimann N, Bartnitzke S, Nolte I, Bullerdiek J. Working with canine chromosomes: current recommendations for karyotype description. J Hered 1999;90:31-34.
4. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 1980;32:314-331.
5. Lisitsyn NA, Segre JA, Kusumi K, et al. Direct isolation of polymorphic markers linked to a trait by genetically directed representational difference analysis. Nat Genet 1994;6:57-63.
6. Everts RE, Versteeg SA, Renier C, et al. Isolation of DNA markers informative in purebred dog families by genomic representational difference analysis (gRDA). Mamm Genome 2000;11: 741-747.
7. Bowler LD, Hubank M, Spratt BG. Representational difference analysis of cDNA for the detection of differential gene expression in bacteria: development using a model of iron-regulated gene expression in Neisseria meningitidis. Microbiology 1999;145: 3529-3537.
8. Hughes BA, Gallemore RP, Miller SS. Transport mechanisms in the retinal pigment epithelium. In: Marmor MF, Wolfensberger TJ, eds. The retinal pigment epithelium. Oxford University Press, New York. 1998.
9. Bedford PGC. Retinal pigment epithelial dystrophy (CPRA): A study of the disease in the Briard. J Small Anim Pract 1984;25: 129-138.
10. Grahn BH, Philibert H, Cullen CL, Houston DM, Semple HA, Schmutz SM. Multifocal retinopathy of Great Pyrenees dogs. Vet Ophthalmol 1998;1:211-221.
11. Grahn BH, Cullen CL. Retinopathy of Great Pyrenees dogs: fluorescein angiography, light microscopy and transmitting and scanning electron microscopy. Vet Ophthalmol 2001;4:191-199.
12. Aguirre GD, Ray J, Stramm LE. Diseases of the retinal pigment epithelium-photoreceptor complex in non-rodent animal models. In: Marmor MF, Wolfensberger TJ, eds. The retinal pigment epithelium. Oxford University Press, New York. 1998.
13. Hubank M, Schatz DG. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:5640-5648.
14. Thumann G, Kociok N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Esser P, Schraermeyer U, Heimann K. Detection of mRNA for proteins involved in retinol metabolism in iris pigment epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:1046-1051.