Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 619-621

  Kejriwal, Ritwik ^a   Liang, Jennifer ^a   Anderson, Graeme ^b   Hill, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Choledocholithiasis; Cholelithiasis; Common bile duct; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 4444255038     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03114.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. NIH Consensus Panel. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH Consensus Statement 1992; 10: 1-26.
2. Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M et al. Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann. Surg. 2003; 238: 97-102.
3. Millat B, Borie F. [Common bile duct stones and their complications.] Rev. Prat. 2000; 50: 2123-9.
4. Poole GH, Yellapu S. Acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A case controlled study. Surg. Endosc. 2000; 14: 106-9.
5. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br. J. Surg. 2003; 90: 42-7.
6. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 314-20.
7. Urban M, Holzer B, Sebesta C et al. Efficacy of diagnosis of mechanical cholestasis by magnetic resonance cholangiography. World J. Surg. 2002; 26: 353-8.
8. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW et al. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32.
9. Lee MG, Lee HJ, Kim MH et al. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997; 202: 663-9.
10. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR 1995; 165: 295-300.
11. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C et al. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 109-15.
12. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 589-97.
13. Musella M, Barbalace G, Capparelli G et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the common bile duct. Br. J. Surg. 1998; 85: 16-19.
14. Koo KP, Traverso LW. Do predictive indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am. J. Surg. 1996; 171: 495-9.