Above- and below-ground effects from alfalfa and marsh reedgrass on aspen seedlings

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 199, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 411-422

  Powell, George W ^a   Bork, Edward W ^a  

^a Food   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agroforestry; Aspen; Competition; Facilitation; Root; Shoot

Indexed keywords

HERBACEOUS VEGETATION; MARSH REEDGRASS; SOIL NITRATES;

GROUND EFFECT; MOISTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SOILS; VEGETATION;

FORESTRY;

AGROFORESTRY; FACILITATION; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; ROOT COMPETITION; SOIL MOISTURE;

ALFALFA; FORESTS; GROUND COVER; MOISTURE; PLANTS; SEEDLINGS; SOIL;

CALAMAGROSTIS; CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS; MEDICAGO; MEDICAGO SATIVA; POPULUS; POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

EID: 4444250839     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.055     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Balatinecz J.J., Kretschmann D.E., Leclercq A. Achievements in the utilization of poplar wood - guideposts for the future. For. Chron. 77:2001;217-392
2. Cahill J.F. Jr. Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species. Oikos. 99:2002;101-112
3. Cannell M.G.R., Grace J. Competition for light: detection, measurement and quantification. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1993;1969-1979
4. Coomes D.A., Grubb P.J. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 70:2000;171-207
5. He Z.L., Alva A.K., Calvert D.V., Banks D.J. Ammonia volatilization from different fertilizer sources and effects of temperature and soil pH. Soil Sci. 164:1999;750-758
6. Hendershot, W.H., Lalande, H., Duquette, M., 1993. Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In: Carter, M.R. (Ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Can. Soc. Soil Sci., Lewis Publisher, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 167-175.
7. Hobbie S.E., Chapin F.S. III An experimental test of limits to tree establishment in Arctic tundra. J. Ecol. 86:1998;449-461
8. Landhäusser S.M., Lieffers V.J. Growth of Populus tremuloides in association with Calamagrostis canadensis. Can. J. For. Res. 28:1998;396-401
9. Littell, R.C., Stroup, W.W., Freund, R.J., 2002. SAS® for Linear Models, 4th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
10. Maynard, D.G., Kalre, Y.P., 1993. Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Carter, M.R. (Ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Can. Soc. Soil Sci., Lewis Publisher, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 25-38.
11. Montieth J.L. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 281:1977;277-294
12. Perala D.A., Alban D.H. Biomass, nutrient distribution and litterfall in Populus, Pinus and Picea stands on two different soils in Minnesota. Plant Soil. 64:1982;177-192
13. Pregitzer, K.S. Friend, A.L., 1996. The structure and function of Populus root systems. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinkley, T.M. (Eds.), The Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 331-354.
14. Ruark G.A. Evidence for the reserve shelterwood system for managing quaking aspen. North. J. Appl. For. 7:1990;58-62
15. Strong, W.L., Leggat, K.R., 1992. Ecoregions of Alberta. Alberta Forestry, Lands and Wildlife, Edmonton, Alberta.
16. Ward, B., 2001. Poplar as a crop - it's place in a changing agriculture. In: Schroeder, W., Kort, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference on Agroforestry in North America: Temperate Agroforestry: Adaptive and Mitigative Roles in a Changing Physical and Socio-Economic Climate, Regina, Saskatchewan, 13-15 August 2001, pp. 9-11.
17. Wilson J.B. Shoot competition and root competition. J. Appl. Ecol. 25:1988;279-296