Advertisement call complexity in northern leopard frogs, Rana pipiens

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 3, 2004, Pages 676-682

  Larson, Krista A ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; FROG; TEMPORAL VARIATION; VOCALIZATION;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; FELIDAE; HAEMULIDAE; PANTHERA PARDUS; RANA PIPIENS; REPTILIA;

EID: 4444248328     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CH-03-247R2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ALDER, T. B., AND G. J. ROSE. 2000. Integration and recovery processes contribute to the temporal selectivity of neurons in the midbrain of the Northern Leopard Frog, Rana pipiens. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186:923-937.
2. CASTELLANO, S., B. CUATTO, R. RINELLA, A. ROSSO, AND C. GIACOMA. 2002. The advertisement, call of the European Treefrogs (Hyla arborea): a multilevel study of variation. Ethology 108:75-89.
3. FICKEN, M. S., E. D. HAILMAN, AND J. P. HAILMAN. 1994. The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican Chickadee. Condor 96:70-82.
4. GERHARDT, H. C. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42:615-635.
5. _. 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:293-324.
6. _, AND F. HUBER. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
7. GOTTMAN, J. M., AND A. K. ROY. 1990. Sequential analysis: a guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
8. HILLIS, D. M. 1988. Systematics of the Rana pipiens complex: puzzle and paradigm. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:39-63.
9. LITTLEJOHN, M. J., AND P. A. HARRISON. 1985. The functional significance of the diphasic advertisement call of Geocrinia victoriana (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16:363-373.
10. _, AND R. S. OLDHAM. 1968. Rana pipiens complex: mating call structure and taxonomy. Science 162:1003-1005.
11. MECHAM, J. S. 1971. Vocalizations of the Leopard Frog, Rana pipiens, and three related Mexican species. Copeia 1971:505-516.
12. NARINS, P. M., AND R. R. CAPRANICA. 1976. Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Science 192:378-380.
13. _, AND _. 1978. Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J. Comp. Physiol. 127:1-9.
14. _, E. R. LEWIS, AND B. E. MCCLELLAND. 2000. Hyperextended call note repertoire of the endemic Madagascar Treefrog Boophis madagascariensis (Rhacophoridae). J. Zool., Lond. 250:283-298.
15. NOBLE, G. K., AND L. R. ARONSON. 1942. The sexual behavior of anura: the normal mating pattern of Rana pipiens. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 80:127-142.
16. OVASKA, K. E., AND J. CALDBECK. 1997. Vocal behaviour of the frog Eleutherodactylus antillensis on the British Virgin Islands. Anim. Behav. 54:181-188.
17. PACE, A. E. 1974. Systematic and biological studies of the leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) of the United States. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 148:1-140.
18. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
19. RYAN, M. J. 1980. Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Science 209:523-525.
20. _. 1985. The Túngara Frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
21. SCHMIDT, R. S. 1968. Chuckle calls of the Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens). Copeia 1968:561-569.
22. SCHWARTZ, J. J., AND K. D. WELLS. 1984. Interspecific acoustic interactions of the Neotropical Treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14:211-224.
23. WAGNER JR., W. E. 1989. Social correlates of variation in male calling behavior in Blanchard's Cricket Frog, Acris crepitans blanchardi. Ethology 82:27-45.
24. WELLS, K. D. 1988. The effect of social interactions on anuran vocal behavior, p. 433-454. In: The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. B. Fritsch, M. J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T. E. Hetherington, and W. Walkowiak (eds.). John Wiley and Sons, New York.