Is looking good enough or does it beggar belief?

Developmental Science

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 415-417

  Hood, Bruce M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; INFANT; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 4444239805     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00358.x     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Baillargeon, R. (2004). Infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations. Developmental Science, 7, 391-414.
2. Berthier, N., DeBlois, S., Poirier, C.R., Novak, M.A., & Clifton, R.K. (2000). What's behind the door? Two- and three-year-olds reason about unseen events. Developmental Psychology, 36, 394-401.
3. Goodale, M.A., & Milner, A.D. (2003). Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Haith, M.M. (1998). Who put the cog in cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behaviour and Development, 21, 167-179.
5. Hauser, M.D. (2003). Knowing about knowing: dissociations between perception and action systems over evolution and during development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001, 79-103.
6. Hood, B.M. (2001). When do infants know about objects? Perception, 30, 1281-1284.
7. Hood, B.M., Carey, S., & Prasada, S. (2000). Predicting the out-comes of physical events: two-year-olds fail to reveal a knowledge of solidity and support. Child Developmental, 71, 1540-1554.
8. Hood, B., Cole-Davies, V., & Dias, M. (2003). Looking and search measures of object knowledge in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 61-70.
9. Kaiser, M.K., Proffitt, D.R., & Anderson, K. (1985). Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 795-803.
10. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Keen, R. (2003). Representation of objects and events: why do infants look so smart and toddlers look so dumb? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 79-83.
12. Kyeong, I.K., & Spelke, E.S. (1999). Perception and understanding of effects of gravity and inertia on object motion. Developmental Science, 2, 339-362.
13. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 284, 122-130.
14. McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naïve beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210, 1139-1141.
15. Rensink, R.A. (2004). Sensing without seeing. Psychological Science, 15, 27-32.
16. Santos, L.R. (2004). Core knowledges: a dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a nonhuman primate? Developmental Science, 7, 167-174.
17. Santos, L.R., & Hauser, M.D. (2002). A nonhuman primate's understanding of solidity: dissociations between seeing and acting. Developmental Science, 5. F1-F7.