The influence of retest artifact on the measuring outcome in psychotherapy, for example of the Inventory of Intepersonal Problems (IIP) and the Eating Disoder Inventory (EDI);Der einfluss des retest-artefakts auf die ergebnismessung in der psychotherapie am beispiel des Inventars zur Erfassung Interpersoneller Probleme (IIP) und des Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI)

Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 265-278

  Percevic, Robert ^a   Wolf, Markus ^a   Kordy, Hans ^a  

^a Forschungsstelle fur Psychotherapie   (Germany)

Author keywords

EDI; Effect size; IIP; Reliable change; Retest artifact

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; EATING DISORDER; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH; SELF REPORT;

EID: 4444239254     PISSN: 14318172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahava, G. W., Iannone, C., Grebstein, L. & Schirling, J. (1998). Is the Beck Depression Inventory reliable over time? An evaluation of multiple test-retest reliability in a nonclinical college student sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 222-231.
2. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S. & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521-536.
3. Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2002). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.
4. Bromet, E. J., Dunn, L. O., Connell, M. M., Dew, M. A. & Schulberg, H. C. (1986). Long-term reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 435-441.
5. Durham, C. J., McGrath, L. D., Burlingame, G. M., Schaalje, G. B., Lambert, M. J. & Davies, D. R. (2002). The effects of repeated administrations on self-report and parent-report-scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 240-257.
6. Fisseni, H.-J. (1997). Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
7. Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating Disorder Inventory-2 - Professional Manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Garner, D. M. & Olmsted, M. P. (1984). The Eating Disorder Inventory Manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P. & Polivy, J. (1983). Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 15-34.
10. Hatzenbuehler, L. C., Parpal, M. & Matthews, L. (1983). Classifying college students as depressed or nondepressed using the Beck Depression Inventory: An empirical analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 360-366.
11. Henderson, A. S., Byrne, D. G. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981). Neurosis and the social environment. Sydney: Academic Press Australia.
12. Horowitz, L. M. (1979). On the cognitive structure of interpersonal problems treated in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 5-15.
13. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Bauer, B. A., Ureno, G. & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
14. Horowitz, L. M., Strauß, B. & Kordy, H. (2000). IIP-D Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme - Manual. Göttingen: Beltz.
15. Jacobson, N. S. & Truax, P. (1992). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological Issues & Strategies in Clinical Research (pp. 631-648). Washington: American Psychological Association.
16. Jäger, R. S. & Petermann, F. (1995). Psychologische Diagnostik. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
17. Jorm, A. F., Duncan-Jones, P. & Scott, R. (1989). An analysis of the re-test artifact in longitudinal studies of psychiatric symptoms and personality. Psychological Medicine, 19, 487-493.
18. Lambert, M. J., Thompson, K., Andrews, A., Kadera, S., & Eriksen, K. (1996). The test-retest artifact in estimates of psychotherapy dose-response estimates. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Amelia Island, Florida.
19. Lambert, M. J., Hannöver, W., Nisslmüller, K., Richard, M. & Kordy, H. (2002). Fragebogen zum Ergebnis von Psychotherapie: Zur Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Übersetzung des Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 40-47.
20. Lienert, G. A. & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.
21. Maling, M. S., Gurtmann, M. B. & Howard, K. I. (1995). The response of interpersonal problems to varying doses of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 63-75.
22. Ormel, J., Koeter, M. W. J. & van den Brink, W. (1989). Measuring change with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) - The problem of retest effects. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24, 227-232.
23. Sieber, M. (1979). Retest-Untersuchung zur Stabilität beim Persönlichkeitsfragebogen FPI. Diagnostica, 15, 181-190.
24. Thiel, A. & Paul, T. (1988). Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen Version des Eating Disorder-Inventory (EDI). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 9, 267-278.
25. Thiel, A., Jacobi, C., Horstmann, S., Paul, T., Nutzinger, D. O. & Schüßler, G. (1997). Eine deutschsprachige Version des Eating Disorder Inventory EDI-2. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 47, 365-376.
26. Willson, V. L. & Putnam, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 249-258.
27. Windle, C. (1954). Test-retest effect on personality questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 617-633.
28. Windle, C. (1955). Further studies of test-retest effect on personality questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 15, 246-253.