Penetrating keratoplasty performed by residents

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1333-1336

  Kutzscher, Ethan M ^a,b   Sorenson, Andrew L ^a   Goodman, Daniel F ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORNEA SURGERY; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TRAINING; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 4444231895     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.9.1333     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Pingree MF, Crandall AS, Olson RJ. Cataract surgery complications in 1 year at an academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:705-708.
2. Smith JH, Seiff SR. Outcomes of resident surgery by residents at a public county hospital. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:448-454.
3. Tarbet KJ, Mamalis N, Theurer J, Jones BD, Olson RJ. Complications and results of phacoemulsification performed by residents. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:661-665.
4. Cruz OA, Wallace GW, Gay CA, Matoba AY, Kock DD. Visual results and complications of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation performed by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:448-452.
5. Straatsma BR, Meyer KT, Bastek JV, Lightfoot DO. Posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation by ophthalmology residents: a prospective study of cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:327-335.
6. Wiggins RE, Cobo M, Foulks GN. Results of penetrating keratoplasty by residents. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:851-853.
7. Gross RH, Poulsen EJ, Davitt S, Schwab IR, Mannis MJ. Comparison of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty by experienced cornea surgeons and cornea fellows. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:636-643.
8. Akpek EK, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Karadayi K, Christen W, Stark WJ. Long-term outcomes of combined penetrating keratoplasty with iris-sutured intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1017-1022.
9. O'Day DG. Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1997:1719-1730.
10. Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, Lundergan MK, Olson RJ. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1409-1411.
11. Kervick GN, Shepherd WFI. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21:227.
12. Brightbill FS, Brass RE. Preoperative evaluation of the keratoplasty patient. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1997:1563-1569.
13. Price FW, Whitson WE, Marks RG. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1177-1185.
14. Schanzlin DJ, Robin JB, Gomez DS, Gindi JJ, Smith RE. Results of penetrating keratoplasty for aphakic and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:302-312.
15. Stainer GA, Perl T, Binder PS. Controlled reduction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:668-676.
16. Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Pfleger T, Zehetmayer M, Hanselmayer G, Skorpik C. Three-year clinical outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with the guided trephine system. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:666-673.
17. Clinch TE, Thompson HW, Gardner BP, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE. An adjustable double running suture technique for keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 116:201-206.
18. Dursun D, Forster RK, Feuer WJ. Suturing technique for control of postkeratoplasty astigmatism and myopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:51-57.
19. Karabatsas CH, Cook SD, Figueiredo FC. Combined interrupted and continuous versus single continuous adjustable suturing in penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized study of induced astigmatism during the first postoperative year. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1991-1998.
20. Forster RK. A comparison of two selective interrupted suture removal techniques for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997;95:193-214.
21. Filatov V, Alexandrakis G, Talamo JH. Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:696-700.
22. Davison JA, Bourne WM. Results of penetrating keratoplasty using a double running suture technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1591-1595.
23. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:871-874.
24. Karesh JW, Nirankari VS. Factors associated with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:160-164.
25. Jonas JB, Rank RM, Hayler JK, Budde WM. Intraocular pressure after homologous penetrating keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:32-37.
26. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1992;11:427-432.