Climate change policy in European countries and its effects on industry

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 453-473

  Proost, Stef ^a   Van Regemorter, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

climate change policy; environmental policy; industry; marketable permits; taxes

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLLUTION TAX;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 4444224346     PISSN: 13812386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:MITI.0000038849.35276.3c     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bovenberg and Goulder: 2001, 'Neutralizing the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: What does it cost?', in C. Carraro and G. Metcalf (eds.), Behavioural and Distributional Effects of Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, University of Chicago Press.
2. Braden, J. and Proost, S. (eds.): 1997, The Economic Theory of Environmental Policy in a Federal System, Edward Elgar, 166 pp.
3. Capros, P., Georgakopoulos, P., Van Regemorter, D., Proost, S., Schmit, T., Koschel, H., Conrad, C. and Vouyoukas, E.: 1999, Climate Change Strategies 2: The Macro-Economic Cost and Benefit of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the EU, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, 224 pp.
4. Carraro, C. and Metcalf, G. (eds.): 2001, Behavioural and Distributional Effects of Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, University of Chicago Press.
5. Commission of the European Communities: 2001, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, Com (2001) 581 final.
6. Fullerton, D.: 2001, 'A framework to compare environmental policies', Southern Economic Journal 68(2), 224-248.
7. Goulder, L., Parry, I., Williams, R.C. and Burtraw, D.: 1999, 'The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second best setting', J. Public Econ. 72(3), 329-360.
8. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press.
9. Jensen, J. and Rasmussen, T.: 2000, 'Allocation of CO2 emission permits: a general equilibrium analysis of policy instruments', J. Envir. Econ. & Manag. 40, 111-136.
10. Keohane, N., Revesz, R. and Stavins, R.: 1998, 'The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy'. Harvard Envir. Law Rev. 22(2), 313-367.
11. Maestad, O.: 2001, 'Efficient climate policy with internationally mobile firms', Envir. Res. Econ. 19, 267-284.
12. Proost, S. and Braden, J. (eds.): 1998, Climate Change, Transport and Environmental Policy - Empirical Applications in a Federal System, Edward Elgar, 252 pp.
13. Parry, I., Williams, R.C. and Goulder, L.: 1999, 'When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare: the fundamental role of distorted factor markets', J. Envir. Econ. & Manag. 37(1), January, 52-84.
14. Proost, S. and Van Regemorter, D.: 1995, 'The double dividend and the role of inequality aversion and macro-economic regimes', Int. Tax and Public Finance 2(2), 207-219.
15. Weyant, J. (ed.): 1999, 'The costs of the Kyoto protocol: a multi-model evaluation', Energy J., special issue.