Effect of age on the pupillomotor field

Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 228-234

  Schmid, Ruediger ^a   Ceurremans, Per ^a   Luedtke, Holger ^a   Wilhelm, Barbara J ^a,b   Wilhelm, Helmut M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Abteilung fuer Strahlentherapie   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL REFLEX; PUPILLOGRAPHY; PUPILLOMETRY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUPIL; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 4444224016     PISSN: 10708022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00041327-200409000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Schmid R, Wilhelm B, Wilhelm H. Pupillomotor campimetry in normals. Neuro-ophthalmol 2000;23:7-13
2. Kardon RH. Pupil perimetry. Editorial review. Current Opinion Ophthalmol 1992;3:565-70
3. Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmology 1991;98:485-95
4. Loewenfeld IE. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications vol. 1. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1993:142-6
5. Loewenfeld IE. Pupillary changes related to age. In: Thompson HS, Daroff R, Frisen L, Glaser JS, Sanders MD, eds. Topics in Neuroophthalmology Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1979:124-50.
6. Loewenfeld IE, Newsome DA. Iris mechanics. I. Influence of pupil size on dynamics of pupillary movements. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;71:347-62
7. Ordy JM, Brizzee KR, Johnson HA. Cellular alterations in visual pathways and the limbic system: Implications for vision and short-term memory. In: Sekuler R, Kline D, Dismukes K, eds. Aging and human visual functions. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc; 1982:79-114
8. Balazsi AG, Rootman J, Drance SM, et al. The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;97:760-6
9. Johnson BM, Miao M, Sadun AA. Age-related decline of human optic nerve axon populations. Age 1987;10:5-9.
10. Dietrich TJ, Ata N, Sänger A, et al. Age influences asymmetry in differential luminance sensitivity. In: Wall M, Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/99, Proceedings of the XIIIth International Perimetric Society. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler; 1999:223-7
11. Casson EJ, Johnson CA, Nelson-Quigg JM. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3096-102
12. Haas A, Flammer J, Schneider U. Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:199-203
13. Zulauf M. Normal visual fields measured with Octopus programm Gl. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:509-15.
14. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9
15. Brenton RS, Phelps CD. The normal visual field in the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Ophthalmologica 1986;193:56-74
16. Katz J, Sommer A. Asymmetry and Variation in the Normal Hill of Vision. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:65-8
17. Hennelly ML, Barbur JL, Edgar DF, et al. The effect of age on the light scattering characteristics of the eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:197-203
18. Gao H, Hollyfield JG. Aging of the Human Retina. Differential Loss of Neurons and Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:1-17
19. Curcio CA, Drucker DN. Retinal ganglion cells in Alzheimer's disease and aging. Ann Neurol 1993;33:248-57
20. Langrova H, Seeliger MW, Kretschmann U, et al. Age dependence of Multifocal ERG amplitude and implicit time. In: Kremlacek J, Kuba M, Kubova Z, eds. Abstract book of the 36th ISCEV symposium. Hradec Kralove: ATD Press; 1998:55
21. Porciatti V, Burr DC, Morrone MC, et al. The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Res 1992;32:1199-209
22. Trick LR. Age-related alterations in retinal function. Doc Ophthalmol 1987;65:35-43
23. Birch DG, Anderson JL. Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1571-6
24. Weleber RG. The effect of age on human cone and rod ganzfeld electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;20:392-9
25. Cibis GW, Campos EC, Aulhorn E. Pupillary hemiakinesia in suprageniculate lesions. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:1322-7.
26. Hamann KU, Hellner KA, Muller-Jensen A, et al. Videopupillographic and VER investigations in patients with congenital and acquired lesions of the optic radiation. Ophthalmologica 1979;178:348-56.
27. Hong S, Narkiewicz J, Kardon RH. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:957-65
28. Fahle M, Schmid M. Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex. Vis Res 1988;28:293-300
29. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5-25
30. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, et al. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 1990;292:497-523
31. Jonas JB, Schneider U, Naumann GO. Count and density of human retinal photoreceptors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992;230:505-10
32. Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Tanakadate A, et al. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients. J Neuroophthalmol 1999;19:89-99