Phylogenetic systematics of Strophostyles (Fabaceae): A North American temperate genus within a neotropical diversification

Systematic Botany

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 627-653

  Riley Hulting, Erin T ^a   Delgado Salinas, Alfonso ^b   Lavin, Matt ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOLICHOPSIS; EMBRYOPHYTA; FABACEAE; STROPHOSTYLES; STROPHOSTYLES HELVULA; STROPHOSTYLES LEIOSPERMA; STROPHOSTYLES UMBELLATA;

EID: 4444221880     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/0363644041744464     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. BARNES, T. G. and S. W. FRANCIS. 2004. Wildflowers and ferns of Kentucky. Louisville: University Press of Kentucky.
2. BENTHAM, G. 1837. Commentationes de leguminosarum generibus. Vienna: Sollingeri.
3. BEYRA-M, A. and M. LAVIN. 1999. Monograph of Pictetia (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) and review of the Aeschynomeneae. Systematic Botany Monographs 56: 1-93.
4. BIRD, L. G. and R. D. BIRD. 1931. Winter food of Oklahoma Quail. Wilson Bulletin 43: 293-305.
5. CANDOLLE, A. P. DE. 1825. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Vol. 2. Paris: Treuttel and Wortz.
6. CORRELL, D. S. and M. C. JOHNSTON. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Renner: Texas Research Foundation.
7. DELGADO-SALINAS, A. 1985. Systematics of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae) in North and Central America, Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Texas, Austin (UMI No. 8527553).
8. _, and C. P. LEWIS. 1997. Oryxis, a new genus in tribe Phaseoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from Brazil. Kew Bulletin 52: 221-225.
9. _, T. TURLEY, A. RICHMAN, and M. LAVIN. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Systematic Botany 23: 438-460.
10. _ and M. LAVIN. In press. Proposal to change the conserved type of Phaseolus, hervolus nom. cons. and to conserve the name Glycine umbellata with a conserved type (Fabaceae). Taxon 53(3).
11. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. The Bryologist 88: 172-181.
12. ERICKSON, D. L. and D. R. YOUNG. 1995. Salinity response, distribution, and possible dispersal of a barrier island strand glycophyte, Strophostyles umbellata (Fabaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 122: 95-100.
13. FOERSTE, A. F. 1885. The fertilization of the wild bean (Phaseolus diversifolius). American Naturalist 19: 887-888.
14. GREUTER, W., J. MCNEILL, F. R. BARRIE, H. M. BURDET, V. DEMOULIN, T. S. FILGUEIRAS, D. H. NICOLSON, P. C. SILVA, J. E. SKOG, P. TREHANE, N. J. TURLAND, and D. L. HAWKSWORTH. eds. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Regnum Vegetabile 138: 1-474.
15. HU, J.-M., M. LAVIN, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, and M. J. SANDERSON. 2002. Phylogenetic Analysis of Nuclear Ribosomal ITS/5.8S Sequences in the Tribe Millettieae (Fabaceae): Poecilanthe-Cyclolobium, the core Millettieae, and the Callerya Group. Systematic Botany 27: 722-733.
16. HUBBELL, S. P. 2001. Tlic Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology 32. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. HUTTON, M. E-J. and R. H. PORTER. 1937. Seed impermeability and viability of native and introduced species of Leguminosae. Journal of Science of the Iowa State College 12: 5-24.
18. ISELY, D. 1990. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States, volume 3, part 2, Leguminosae (Fabaceae). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
19. _. 1998. Native and naturalized Leguminosae (Fabaceae) of the United States (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii). Provo: Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University.
20. JELLIFE, S. E. 1899. The flora of Long Island. Privately printed.
21. KROMBEIN, K. V., P. D. HURD, D. R. SMITH, and B. D. BURKS. 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico, Volume 2, Apocrita (Aculeata). Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
22. LACKEY, J. A. 1981. Tribe 10. Phaseoleae DC. (1825). Pp. 301-327 in Advances in legume systematic, part 1, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
23. _. 1983. A review of generic concepts in American Phaseolinae (Fabaceae, Faboideae). Iselya 2: 21-64.
24. LAVIN, M., M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, P. GASSON, C. HUCHES, and E. WHEELER. 2003. Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Courselin and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Systematic Botany 28: 387-409.
25. LEWIS, G. P. and A. DELGADO-SALINAS. 1994. Mysanthus, a new genus in tribe Phaseoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from Brazil. Kew Bulletin 49: 343-351.
26. MAGEE, D. W. and H. E. AHLES. 1999. Flora of the Northeast; a manual of the vascular flora of New England and adjacent New York. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
27. MARÉCHAL, R., J. M. MASCHERPA, and F. STAINIER. 1978. Etude taxonomique d'un groupe complexe d'espèces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Paplionaceae) sur la base de donnees morphologiques et polliniques, traitees par l'analyse informatique. Beissiera 28: 1-273.
28. MARTIN, J. N. 1937. Strophostyles helvola (L.) Britton, its habits and probable value on eroded areas. Journal of Science of the Iowa State College 12: 25-35.
29. PELOTTO, J. P. and M. A. DEL PERO MARTÍNEZ. 1998. Flavonoids in Strophostyles species and the related genus Dolichopsis (Phaseolinae, Fabareae): distribution and phylogenetic significance. Sida 18: 213-222.
30. PENNINGTON, R. T., D. A. PRADO, and C. PENDRY. 2000. Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Pleistocene vegetation changes. Journal of Biogeography 27: 261-273.
31. PRADO, D. E., and P. E. GIBBS. 1993. Patterns of species distributions in the dry seasonal forests of South America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 902-927.
32. RADFORD, A. E. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
33. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Sc-AI, sequence alignment editor. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford (available at http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/).
34. RIDLEY, H. N. 1990 (Reprint). The dispersal of plants throught the world. India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
35. ROBERTSON, C. 1890. Flowers and insects. V. Botanical Gazette 15:199-204.
36. ROHLE, J. F:. 2000. NTSYSpc, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1 (© 2002 by Applied Biostatistics. Inc.). Exeter Software. New York: Setauket.
37. ROY, S. C., T. K. BERA, and A. SARKAR. 1992. Cytotaxonomical studies on 9 taxa of Macroptiliuin and Strophostyles helvola. Cell and Chromosome Research 15: 3-2.3.
38. SANDERSON, M. J. and J. J. DOYLE. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in North American Astragalus (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 18: 395-408
39. SCHNABEL, A., P. E. MCDONEL, and J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 90: 310-320.
40. SCHRIRE, B. D., M. LAVIN, N. P. BARKER, H. CORTES-BURNS, I. VON SENGER, and J.-H. KIM. 2003. Towards a phylogeny of hidigofera (Leguminosae- Papilionoideae): identification of major clades and relative ages. Pp. 269-302 in Advances in legume systematic, part 10, Higher level systematics, eds. A. Bruneau and B. Klitgaard. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
41. STAFLEU, F. and R. COWAN. 1981. Taxonomic Literature II. Vol. 3 Regnum vegetabile 105: 1-980. W. Junk b.v., Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
42. SWOFFORD, D. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0 beta10. Sunderland. Sinauer Associates, Inc.
43. TORREY, J. and A. GRAY. 1838. Phaseolus. Flora of North America vol. 1 number 2, p. 280. New York: Wiley & Putnam.
44. TURNER, B. L. 1956. Chromosome numbers in the Leguminosae. J. American Journal of Botany 43: 577-581.
45. USDA-NRCS. 2003. The PLANTS database (http://plants.usda.gov/plants). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.
46. VERDCOURT, B. 1997. (1289-1299) Proposals to conserve the names Phaseolus helvolus with a conserved type and spelling, and Strophostyles against Phasellus (Leguminosae). Taxon 46: 357-359. [Both proposals were approved in 1999. Taxon 48: 373 378 in the Report of the General Committee: 8, by Dan H. Nicolson, Secretary].
47. VERDCOURT, B. 1997. (1289-1299) Proposals to conserve the names Phaseolus helvolus with a conserved type and spelling, and Strophostyles against Phasellus (Leguminosae). Taxon 46: 357-359. [Both proposals were approved in 1999. Taxon 48: 373 378 in the Report of the General Committee: 8, by Dan H. Nicolson, Secretary].
48. WEATHERBY, C. A. 1942. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University-No. CXLI. A list of types specimens in Elliot's Herbarium. Rhodora 44: 229-262.
49. WEN, J. 1999. Evolution of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455.
50. WILLIAMS, C. A., J. C. ONYILAGHA, and J. B. HARBORNE. 1995. Flavonoid profiles in leaves, flowers and stems of forty-nine members of the Phaseolinae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 23: 655-667.
51. WISEMAN, D. S. 1997. Food habits and weights of bobwhite from northeastern Oklahoma tall grass prairie. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 57: 110-115.
52. WOJCIECHOWSKI, M. F., M. LAVIN, and M. J. SANDERSON. In press. The plastid matK phylogeny resolves many well-supported subclades within the legume family (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany.
53. YANFUL, M. and M. A. MAUN. 1996a. Spatial distribution and seed mass variation of Strophostyles helvola along Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1313-1321.
54. _ and _. 1996b. Effects of burial of seeds and seedlings from different seed sizes on the emergence and growth of Strophostyles helvola. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1322-1330.
55. ZALLOCCHI, E. M., A. B. POMILIO, and R. A. PALACIOS. 1995. Estudio quimitaxonómico de la subtribu Phaseolinas (Phaseoleae - Papilionoideae - Leguminosae) III: Flavonoides de las especies argentinas de los géneros Phaseolus y Dolichopsis. Darwiniana 33: 135-148.