The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): Design and field procedures

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 69-92

  Kessler, Ronald C ^a   Berglund, Patricia ^b   Chiu, Wai Tat ^a   Demler, Olga ^a   Heeringa, Steven ^b   Hiripi, Eva ^a   Jin, Robert ^a   Pennell, Beth Ellen ^b   Walters, Ellen E ^a   Zaslavsky, Alan ^a   Zheng, Hui ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Design effects; Epidemiologic research design; Sample bias; Sample weights; Survey design efficiency; Survey sampling

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EMPIRICISM; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD EXPERIMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IMPULSE CONTROL DISORDER; INTERVIEW; MENTAL DISEASE; MOOD DISORDER; ORGANIZATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREVALENCE; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; SAMPLING; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; SUICIDE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLING STUDIES; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4444221552     PISSN: 10498931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.167     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DuMouchel WH, Duncan GJ. Using sample Survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78: 535-43.
2. Groves R, Fowler F, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley, in press.
3. Gurin G, Veroff J, Feld SC. Americans View Their Mental Health: A Nationwide Interview. New York: Basic Books Inc., 1960.
4. Kessler RC, Üstün TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2004; (this issue).
5. Kish L, Frankel MR. Inferences from complex samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1974; 36 (Series B): 1-37.
6. Kish L, Kish JL. Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.
7. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
8. Tourangeau R, Smith TW. Collecting sensitive information with different modes of data collection. In M Couper, RP Baker, J Bethlehem, CZF Clark, J Martin, WL Nicholos II, JM O'Reilly eds. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley, 1998, 431-54.
9. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 1998; 280 (5365): 867-73.
10. Turner CF, Lessler JT, Devore J. Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In CF Turner, JT Lessler and J Gfroerer eds. Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. Rockville MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1982.
11. Veroff J, Douvan E, Kulka R. The Inner American: A Self Portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books, 1981.
12. Wolter KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
13. Zaslavsky AM, Schenker N, Belin TR. Downweighting influential clusters in Surveys: application to the 1990 Post Enumeration Survey. Am J Stat Assoc 2001; 96 (455): 858-69.