Surface conductance induced dielectrophoresis of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes

Nano Letters

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1395-1399

  Krupke, Ralph ^a   Hennrich, Frank ^a   Kappes, Manfred M ^a,b   Löhneysen, Hilbert V ^a,b  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; METAL; SURFACTANT;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRONICS; ELECTROPHORESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NANOTUBE; POLARIZATION; QUANTUM THEORY; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; SEMICONDUCTOR; TECHNOLOGY; VIRUS;

EID: 4444219670     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl0493794     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Saito, R.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Physical properties of carbon nanotubes; Imperial College Press: London, 1998.
2. Li, Y.; Mann, D.; Rolandi, M.; Kim, W.; Ural, A.; Hung, S.; Javey, A.; Cao, J.; Wang, D.; Yenilmez, E.; Wang, Q.; Gibbons, J. F.; Nishi, Y.; Dai, H. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 317-321.
3. Krupke, R.; Hennrich, F.; v. Löhneysen, H.; Kappes, M. M. Science 2003, 301, 344-347.
4. O'Connell, M. J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Huffmann, C. B.; Moore, V. C.; Strano, M. S.; Haroz, E. H.; Railon, K. L.; Boul, P. J.; Noon, W. H.; Kittrell, C.; Ma, J.; Hauge, R. H.; Weisman, R. B.; Smalley, R. E. Science 2002, 297, 593-596.
5. Hait, S. K.; Majhi, P. R.; Blume, A.; Moulik, S. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 3650-3658.
6. Heller, D. A.; Barone, P. W.; Swanson, J. P.; Mayrhofer, R. M.; Strano, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6905-6909.
7. In 1% SDBS suspensions, we observe that micelles tend to agglomerate with time, lowering the separation yield.
8. Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Jorio, A.; Souza Filho, A. G.; Saito, R. Carbon 2002, 40, 2043-2061.
9. Jones, T. B. Electromechanics of particles; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1995.
10. 2 [ln(2l/d) - 1]. See ref 9.
11. Pérez-Rodríguez, M.; Varela, L. M.; García, M.; Mosquera, V.; Sarmiento, S. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1999, 44, 944-947.
12. Benedict, L. X.; Louie, S. G.; Cohen, M. L. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, 8541-8549.
13. Hughes M. P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 250, 291-294. We neglect here also dielectric losses at the tube/liquid interface.
14. Morgan, H.; Green, N. G. J. Electrostatics 1997, 42, 279-293.
15. Ramos, A.; Morgan, H.; Green, N. G.; Castellanos, A. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1998, 31, 2338-2353.
16. For the diameter of the object tube+micelle we refer to a molecular dynamic simulation of tube+SDS in ref 4.
17. Yamamoto, K.; Akita, S.; Nakayama, Y. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1998, 31, L34-L36.
18. Chen, X. Q.; Saito, T.; Yamada, H.; Matsushige, K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 3714-3716.
19. Nagahara, L. A.; Amlani, I.; Lewenstein, J.; Tsui, R. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 3826-3828.
20. Krupke, R.; Hennrich, F.; Weber, H. B.; Beckmann, D.; Hampe, O.; Malik, S.; Kappes, M. M.; v. Löhneysen, H. Appl. Phys. A 2003, 76, 397-400.
21. Suehiro, J.; Zhou, G.; Hara, M. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, L109-L114.
22. Krupke, R.; Hennrich, F.; Weber, H. B.; Kappes, M. M.; v. Löhneysen, H. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1019-1023.