Relating decision making styles to predicting self-efficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 432-436

  Nygren, Thomas E ^a   White, Rebecca J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTUITIVE STYLE; SELF-REPORT MEASURE;

FAILURE ANALYSIS; INVENTORY CONTROL; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 44349195547     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Epstein, S., Pacini, R. Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
2. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
3. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1993). Direct comparison of the efficiency of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. In W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on Judgment and Decision Making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 144-180.
4. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating Intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. rd Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, May 2001.
7. Nygren, T. E. & White, R. J. (2002). Assessing Individual Differences in Decision Making Styles: Analytical vs. Intuitive. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 953-957. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA.
8. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J> (1993). The adaptive decision maker: Effort and accuracy in choice. In W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on Judgment and Decision Making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 181-204.
9. White, R. J. & Nygren, T. E. (2002). Influence of Analytically and Intuitively Framed Instructions upon Multi-Attribute Decision Task Approach. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 497-500. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA.