Conceptualizing and communicating organizational risk dynamics in the thoroughness-efficiency space

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1710-1719

  Marais, K B ^a   Saleh, J H ^b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Accidents; Efficiency penalty; Organizational behavior; Risk; Safety threshold

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EFFICIENCY PENALTY; ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR; SAFETY THRESHOLD;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 44349183649     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Marais K, Saleh JH, Leveson NG. Organisational risk dynamics in complex goal environments. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2007, Stavanger, Norway, June, 2007.
2. Shrivastava P. Bhopal: Anatomy of a crisis. 2nd ed (1992), P. Chapman, London
3. Leveson N.G. Safeware: system safety and computers (1995), Addison Wesley, Reading, MA
4. Kemeny JG. Report of the President's commission on the accident at Three Mile Island, October 1979.
5. Hollnagel Erik. Human reliability analysis: context and control (1993), Academic Press, London
6. Hollnagel Erik. Time to think and time to do? I can fail and so can you!. Hum Factors Aerosp Saf 4 3 (2004) 169-180
7. In: Hollnagel Erik., Woods D.D., and Leveson N.G. (Eds). Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts (2006), Ashgate, Burlington, VT, USA
8. Shrivastava P. Technological and organizational roots of industrial crises: lessons from Exxon Valdez and Bhopal. Technol Forecast Soc Change 45 (1994) 237-253
9. Zohar Dov. Safety climate in industrial organization: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 65 (1980) 96-102
10. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The IAEA's International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (INSAG), The Chernobyl accident: updating of INSAG-1 (INSAG-7), 1992. p. 24.
11. Roberts K.H., and Bea R.G. When systems fail. Organizational Dyn 29 3 (2001) 179-191
12. Osborn R.N., and Jackson D.H. Leaders, riverboat gamblers, or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex, dangerous technologies. Acad Manage J 31 4 (1988) 924-947
13. Cooke D.L. A system dynamics analysis of the Westray mine disaster. Syst Dyn Rev 19 2 (2003) 139-166
14. Rasmussen Jens. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27 2/3 (1997) 183-213
15. Leveson, NG, Dulac, N, Daouk, M, Marais, K, et al. A systems-theoretic approach to safety engineering: a case study monograph of the engineering systems division symposium at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 2004.
16. Hollnagel Erik., and Woods D.D. Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering (2005), Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
17. Gehman HW. Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report volume 1, NASA and GAO, August 2003.
18. Rogers William P. Chairman. Report of the Presidential commission on the space shuttle challenger accident. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1986.
19. Snook S.A. Friendly fire: the accidental shootdown of US Black Hawks over Northern Iraq (2000), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
20. Woods D.D., and Hollnagel Erik. Prologue: resilience engineering concepts. In: Hollnagel Erik., Woods D.D., and Leveson N.G. (Eds). Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts (2006), Ashgate, Burlington, VT, USA
21. Battmann W., and Klumb P. Behavioural economics and compliance with safety regulations. Saf Sci 16 1 (1993) 35-46
22. Reason J., Parker D., and Lawton R. Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behaviour. J Occup Organizational Psychol 71 4 (1998) 289-304
23. Adnett N., and Dawson A. The economic analysis of industrial accidents: a re-assessment. Int Rev Appl Econ 12 2 (1998) 241-255
24. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (CETS). An assessment of space shuttle flight software development processes, committee for review of oversight mechanisms for space shuttle flight software processes (1993), Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, National Research Council, National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/ Available online at 〈http://www.nap.edu/〉. Accessed September 2007
25. Cook R., and Rasmussen J. "Going solid": a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 14 2 (2005) 130-134
26. Marais K., Saleh J.H., and Leveson N.G. Archetypes for organisational safety. Saf Sci 44 7 (2006) 565-582
27. Baker James A, Chairman. The report of the BP US refineries independent safety review panel, 2007. Available online at 〈http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/SP/STAGING/local_assets/assets/pdfs/Baker_panel_report.pdf〉. Accessed September 2007.
28. IAEA. IAEA summary report on the post-accident review meeting on the chernobyl accident. INSAG-1, 1986. p. 76.
29. Cooper M.D. Towards a model of safety culture. Saf Sci 36 2 (2000) 111-136
30. Guldenmund F.W. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci 34 1-3 (2000) 215-257
31. Carroll J.S. Safety culture as an ongoing process: culture surveys as opportunities for enquiry and change. Work Stress 12 3 (1998) 272-284
32. Lee T., and Harrison K. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Saf Sci 34 1 (2000) 61-97
33. Pidgeon N.F. Safety culture: key theoretical issues. Work Stress 12 3 (1998) 202-216
34. Sorensen J.N. Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76 (2002) 189-204
35. Wiegmann D.A., Zhang H., von Thaden T.L., Sharma G.J., and Gibbons A.M. Safety culture: an integrative review. Int J Aviat Psychol 14 2 (2004) 117-134