A probabilistic risk assessment of class I hazardous waste injection wells

Developments in Water Science

Volumn 52, Issue C, 2005, Pages 93-135

  Rish, W R ^a  

^a Hull and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349168444     PISSN: 01675648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5648(05)52010-0     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Buss, D.R. et al., 1984. A Numeric Stimulation Study of Deep-Well Injection in Two Hydrogeologic Settings-Texas Gulf Coast, Great Lakes Basin. GeoTrans, Inc., June 20.
2. Buttram J.R. Operation and maintenance of underground injection wells. Ground Water Monitoring Review 6 3 (1986) 64-67
3. CH2M Hill, 1986a. A Class I Injection Well Survey. Phase II Report-Performance Evaluation. Prepared for Underground Injection Practices Council, Oklahoma City, OK, D19976.S2.00, May.
4. CH2M Hill, 1986b. A Class I Injection Well Survey Phase I Report. Survey of Selected Sites. Prepared for Underground Injection Practices Council, Oklahoma City, OK, D19976.S1, April.
5. Clark, J.E., 1987. Factors that can cause abandoned wells to leak as verified by case histories from class II injection, Texas Railroad Commission files. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Subsurface Injection of Oilfield Brines, May 4-6, New Orleans, LA, pp. 166-223. Sponsored by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Underground Injection Practices Council. Published by the Underground Injection Practices Council, Oklahoma City, OK.
6. Clark, J.E., 1994. Environmental scoring without risk assessment. Presented at Clean Texas 2000-Environmental Trade Fair, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., April 14.
7. Clemen R.T. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1991), PWS-Kent Publishers, Boston, MA pp. 253-254
8. Davis, S., 1987. Responses to Questions from the Chemical Manufacturers Association. Submitted to Chemical Manufacturers Association by Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, April 10.
9. Davis, M.L. and Satterwhite, D.G., 1988. Summary Procedures Guide for Application of Risk and Hazards Analysis Techniques. EG&G, IA.
10. Department of Energy and Natural Resources et al., 1989. Illinois Scientific Surveys Joint Report 2. Evaluation of Underground Injection of Industrial Waste in Illinois.
11. Don L. Warner, Inc. and Engineering Enterprises, Inc., 1984. Confining Layer Study. Prepared for EPA Region V, December.
12. Engineering Enterprises, Inc., Geraghty & Miller, Inc. and Ken E. Davis Associates, 1986. Class I Hazardous Waste Injection Wells Evaluation of Non-Compliance Incidents. Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, September.
13. Envirosphere Company, 1988. Draft Task Report. Below Regulatory Concern Waste Accident Scenario Dose Assessment Task 1: Unexpected Event/Accident Identification. Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, February.
14. Goolsby D.A. Geochemical Effects and Movement of Injected Industrial Waste in a Limestone Aquifer (1972), US Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL
15. Gordon W., and Bloom J. Deeper Problems: Limits to Underground Injection as a Hazardous Waste Disposal Method (1985), Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc
16. Ken E. Davis Associates, 1996. Conclusions and Recommendations on the Assessment of Fourteen Alleged Class I Well Failures. Keda Project No. I 001633, Houston, TX, May 1986.
17. Lannoy and Procaccia, 1996. European Industry Reliability Databank.
18. MacLean, A. and Puchalsky, R., 1994. Where the Wastes Are: Highlights from the Records of the More than 5,000 Facilities that Receive Transfers of TRI Chemicals. OMB Watch and Unison Institute, April.
19. McCormick N.J. Reliability and Risk Analysis, Chapter 3 (1981), Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA
20. Meritt, M.L., 1984. Digital Simulation of the Regional Effects of Subsurface Injection of Liquid Waste Near Pensacola, Florida. US Geological Survey, prepared in cooperation with the Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation, Tallahassee, FL.
21. Miller C., Fischer II T.A., Clark J.E., Porter W.M., Hales C.H., and Tilton J.R. Flow and containment of injected wastes. Ground Water Monitoring Review 6 3 (1986) 37-47
22. Morgan, P.G., 1985. A Closer Look at "Deeper Problems"-A Response to Those Who Would Ban Hazardous Waste Disposal by Underground Injection: The New Mexico Experience. New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division, Underground Injection Control Program.
23. Morganwalp, D.W. and Smith, R.E., 1988. Modeling of Representative Injection Sites.
24. Paque M.J. Class I injection well performance survey. Ground Water Monitoring Review 6 3 (1986) 68-69
25. Scrivner N.C., Bennett K.E., Pease R.A., Kopatsis A., Sanders S.J., Clark D.M., and Rafal M. Chemical fate of injected wastes. Ground Water Monitoring Review 6 3 (1986) 53-57
26. SCS Engineers, 1985. Final Report, Summary of Chemical Manufacturers Association Underground Injection Well Survey. Prepared for CMA UIC Work Group. Washington, DC, February.
27. Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. In: Jorgensen E.P. (Ed). The Poisoned Well: New Strategies for Groundwater Protection (1989), Island Press, Washington, DC
28. Swain, A.D., 1987. Accident Sequence Evaluation Program: Human Reliability Analysis Procedure. NUREG/CR-4772, SAND86-1996, February.
29. Swain, A.D. and Guttman, A.L., 1980. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278, Sandia National Laboratories.
30. The Cadmus Group, Inc., 1995. Regulatory Impact Analysis of Proposed Hazardous Waste Disposal Restrictions for Class I Injection of Phase III Wastes. Prepared for EPA, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, January 12.
31. Underground Injection Practices Council, 1986. Journal of the Underground Injection Practices Council, No. 1. Available from the Ground Water Protection Council Library.
32. Underground Injection Practices Council, 1987. A Class I Injection Well Survey. Phase II Report-Survey of Operations. Oklahoma City, OK, December.
33. Underground Injection Practices Council, 1989. Injection Well Bibliography. Oklahoma City, OK, January.
34. Underground Resource Management, Inc., 1984. Evaluation of a Subsurface Waste Injection System near Vickery, Ohio. Prepared for the Ohio EPA, March.
35. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1985. Report to Congress on Injection of Hazardous Waste. EPA 570/9-85-003, EPA Office of Drinking Water, May.
36. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. OSWER Comparative Risk Project Executive Summary and Overview Report. Washington, DC, September.
37. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1990a. Assessing the Geochemical Fate of Deep-Well-Injected Hazardous Waste, A Reference Guide. EPA/625/6-89/025a, EPA Office of Research and Development, June.
38. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1990b. Assessing the Geochemical Fate of Deep-Well-Injected Hazardous Waste, Summaries of Recent Research. EPA/625/6-89/025b, EPA Office of Research and Development, July.
39. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Analysis of the Effects of EPA Restrictions on the Deep Injection of Hazardous Waste. EPA/570/9-91-031, EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, October.
40. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1993. Letter from Martha G. Prothro, Acting Assistant Administrator, EPA Office of Water, to the Honorable John D. Dingell, Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives, Attachment W, April 19.
41. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Draft UICWELLS Database, EPA Office of Water, Underground Injection Control Branch, April.
42. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. 1997 Toxics Release Inventory Public Data Release Report. EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, April.
43. Visocky, A.P., Nealon, J.S., Brower, R.D., Krapac, I.G., Hensel, B.R. and Guthrie, M.A. 1986. Study of current underground injection control regulations and practices in Illinois. Ground Water Monitoring Review, 6(3): 59-63.
44. Ward, D.S. et al., 1987. A Numerical Evaluation of Class I Injection Wells for Waste Containment Performance. GeoTrans, Inc. Prepared for EPA Office of Drinking Water, Underground Injection Control Program, September 30.
45. Warner, D.L. and Lehr, J.H., 1977. An Introduction to the Technology of Subsurface Wastewater Injection. University of Missouri-Rolla and National Water Well Association, prepared for Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab, Ada, OK, December.
46. Wesson, R.L. and Nicholson, C., 1987. Earthquake Hazard Associated with Deep-Well Injection. Prepared for EPA, US Geological Survey, June.
47. Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1995. Underground Injection Well Questionnaire. Survey prepared for Chemical Manufacturers Association, August.