Safety and long term outcome of a new concept for surgical adhesion-reduction strategies (Prevadh®): A prospective, multicenter study

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 55, Issue 82-83, 2008, Pages 517-521

  Mabrut, Jean Yves ^a   Favre, Jean Pierre ^b   Desrousseaux, Bruno ^c   Chipponi, Jacques ^d   Arnaud, Jean Pierre ^e   Domergue, Jacques ^f   Duffas, J P ^g   Fourtanier, Gilles ^g   Flament, Jean Bernard ^h   Gouillat, Christian ⁱ   Berdah, Stéphane ^j   Mantion, Georges ^k   Fagniez, Pierre Louis ^l   Champault, Gérard ^m   Baulieux, Jacques ^a  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔPITAL DU BOCAGE   (France)

^c Centre Hospitalier Saint Philibert GHICL   (France)

^d HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^e ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

^g CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

^h SERVICE DE DERMATOLOGIE   (France)

ⁱ HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^j HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL JEAN MINJOZ   (France)

^l HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^m J Verdier University Hospital   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Adhesion barrier; Peritoneal adhesions; Prevention

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ABSCESS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SKIN INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44349163440     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Menzies D, Ellis H: Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72:60-63.
2. Weibel MA, Manjo G: Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 1973; 126:345-353.
3. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group: Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures. Fertil Steril 1991; 55:700-704.
4. Fevang BTS, Fevang J, Lie SA, Soreide O, Svanes K, Viste A: Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 2004; 240:193-201.
5. Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S: Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186:1-9.
6. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JM, et al: Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353:1476-1480.
7. Buckman RF, Buckman PD, Hufnagel HV, Gervin ASA: A physiologic basis for the adhesion-free healing of deperitonealized surfaces. J Surg Res 1976; 21:67-76.
8. Raferty AT: Regeneration of peritoneum: a fibrinolytic study. J Anat 1979; 129:659-664.
9. Arnold PB, Colleen W, Green BS, Foresman PA, Rodeheaver GT: Evaluation of resorbable barriers for preventing surgical adhesions. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:157-161.
10. Wiseman DM, Gravagna P, Bayon Y, Tayot JL: Collagen membrane / fleece composite film reduces adhesions in the presence of bleeding in a rabbit uterine horn model. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:175-180.
11. Mutter D, Jamali FR, Moody DL, Rodeheaver GT, Thérin M, Marescaux J: The concept of protected mesh to minimize adhesion formation in intraperitoneal abdominal wall reinforcement. Preclinical evaluation of a new composite mesh. Hernia 2000; 4:S3-9.
12. Gonzalez R, Rodeheaver GT, Moody DL, Foresman PA, Ramshaw BJ: Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity. Hernia 2004; 8:213-219.
13. McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL: A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:786-790.
14. Aubé C, Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, et al: detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:131-135.
15. Balique JG, Benchetrit S, Bouillot JL, et al : Intraperitoneal treatment of incisional and umbilical hernias using an innovative composite mesh: four-year results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Hernia 2005; 9:68-74.
16. Arnaud JP, Hennekinne-Mucci S, Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Aube C: Ultrasound detection of visceral adhesion after intraperitoneal ventral hernia treatment: a comparative study of protected versus unprotected meshes. Hernia 2003; 7:85-88.
17. Altmeier WA, Cukbertson WR, Vetto M: Prophylactic antibiotic therapy. Arch Surg 1955; 71:2-6.
18. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183:297-306.
19. Diamond MP, for the Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group: Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm® membrane (Hal-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Fertil Steril 1996; 66:904-910.
20. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG, for the adhesion study group steering committee: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm® adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1310-1319.
21. Sigel B, Golub RM, Loiacono LA, et al: Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc 1991; 5:161-165.
22. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB: Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2649-2653.
23. Harris RD, Holtzman SR, Poppe AM: Clinical outcome in female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings. Radiology 2000; 216:440-443.