A physiological model of cybersickness during virtual environment interaction

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 2230-2234

  Roberts, W Kendal ^a   Gallimore, Jennie J ^b  

^a C4I Systems Engineering ^*  (United States)

^b Wright State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYBERSICKNESS; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 44349162800     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Casali, J. G. (1985). Vehicular simulator-induced sickness. Volume 1. NTSC-TR86-010 AD-A173 904, Naval Training Systems Center, Arlington, VA. Claremount C., A. (1931). Psyche 11. 86-90.
2. Hu, S. & Stern, R. M. (1999). The retention of adaptation and motion sickness eliciting stimulation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70(8), 766-768.
3. Kennedy, R. S., Stanney, K. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (2000). Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5), 463-472.
4. Kennedy, R. S. & Fowlkes, J. E. (1992). Simulator sickness is polygenic and polysymptomatic: Implications for research. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2(1), 23-38.
5. McCauley, M. E. & Sharkey. T. J. (1992). Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1(4), 375-403.
6. Miller, J.C., Sharkey, T.J. Graham, G. A., & McCauley, M.E. (1993). Autonomic Physiological data associated with simulator discomfort. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64(9), 813-819.
7. Nichols, S. C., Cobb, S., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Health and safety implications of virtual environments: Measurement issues. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 667-675
8. Owen, D. H. (1990). Perception and control of changes in self-motion. A functional approach to the study of information and skill. In r. Warren and A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception & Control of Self-Motion, (pp. 289-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Pausch, R., Crea, T., & Conway, M. (1992). A literaturesurvey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(3), 344-363.
10. Regan, E. C. (1995). Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality.Displays, 16(3), 135-139.
11. nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12. Smith, M. (1993). Neural networks for statistical modeling, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
13. Stanney, K.M. and Kennedy, R.S. (2001). Motion sickness in virtual environments. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors. Taylor and Francis.
14. Stanney, K. M., Kennedy, R. S., Drexler, J. M., & Harm, D. L. (1999). Motion sickness and proprioceptive aftereffects following virtual environment exposure. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 27-38.
15. st Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1138-1142.
16. Stoffergen, T. A. & Riccio. (1991). An ecological critique of sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. Ecological Psychology, 3, 159-194.
17. Zurada, J.M. (1992). Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems, West publishing Company, New York.