Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 136, Issue , 2008, Pages 303-308

  Jaspers, Monique W M ^a   Peute, Linda W P ^a   Lauteslager, Arnaud ^b   Bakker, Piet J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment Evaluation; EPR CPR EM; Health professional workstation; HER; User Interfaces

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SURVEYS; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ASSESSMENT-EVALUATION; COMPUTERIZED ORDER ENTRIES; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEM; HEALTH PROFESSIONALS; INTERACTION STRUCTURES; USABILITY EVALUATION; USER SATISFACTION; POST EVALUATIONS; SYSTEM ASPECTS;

USER INTERFACES; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

EID: 44349159589     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. S.J.Wang, Middleton B, Prosser LA, Bardon CG, Spurr CD, Carchidi PJ, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003; 114: 397-403.
2. Hier DB, Rothschild A, LeMaistre A, Keeler J. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. 2005; 74: 657-662.
3. Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11: 300-309.
4. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, et al. Ten Commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10: 523-530.
5. Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health care records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12: 505-516
6. Jaspers MWM, Knaup P, Schmidt D. The computerized record system: where do we stand? Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2006: Methods of Information in Medicine 2006: Supll 1:29-39.
7. Rose AF, Schnipper JL, Park ER, Poon EG, Li Q, Middleton B. Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005; 38: 51-60.
8. Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, Alvarez M, Massip P, Lang T. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more clinical trials or a broader approach? Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16: 407-416.
9. Nielsen J, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Toronto, 1993.
10. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KA. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. ACM CHI'88 Proceedings (1988) 213-218.
11. Lewis JR. IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1995; 7:1: 57-78.
12. Jaspers MWM, Steen T, Van den Bos C, Geenen M. The think-aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform. 2004; 73: 781-795.
13. Gardiner MM, Christie B. Applying cognitive psychology to user interface design, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1994.