Modeling surgical resident performance

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 994-998

  Waxberg, Sara ^a   Cao, Caroline G L ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DATABASE; SURGICAL RESIDENT PERFORMANCE;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

SURGERY;

EID: 44349138055     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. (2003). Common program requirements. [On-line] Retrieved February 27, 2005 from http://www.acgme.org.
2. Baldwin, P.J., Paisley, A.M., & Paterson Brown, S. (1999). Consultant surgeons' opinion of the skills required of basic surgical trainees. British Journal of Surgery, 86(8), 1078-1082.
3. Frary, Robert B. (1996). Hints for designing effective questionnaires. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 5(3). [On-line] Retrieved February 24, 2006 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=3.
4. Risucci, D.A., Tortolani, A.J., & Ward, R.J. (1989). Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors, and peers. Surgical, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 169(6), 519-526.
5. Scott, D.J., Valentine, R.J., Bergen, P.C., Rege, R.V., Laycock, R., Tesfay, S.T., & Jones, D.B. (2000). Evaluating surgical competence with the American Board of Surgery in-training examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment. Surgery, 128(4), 613-622.
6. Thorndike, E.L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.