Regarding "Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for long term outcome"

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1379-1380

  de Borst, Gert J ^a   Moll, Frans L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FOLLOW UP; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; STENT;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ANIMALS; CAROTID STENOSIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECURRENCE; STENTS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44349119787     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.064     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Lal B.K., Kaperonis E.A., Cuadra S., Kapadia I., and Hobson II R.W. Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: classification and implications for long-term outcome. J Vasc Surg 46 (2007) 833-840
2. Gröschel K., Riecker A., Schulz J.B., Ernemann U., and Kastrup A. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 36 (2005) 367-373
3. Chi Y.W., White C.J., Woods T.C., and Goldman C.K. Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 69 (2007) 349-354
4. Hart J.P., Peeters P., Verbist J., Deloose K., and Bosiers M. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 725-730
5. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., Chakhtoura E.Y., and Durán W.N. Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 58-66