Preferred options for receiving sexual health screening results: A population and patient survey

International Journal of STD and AIDS

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 184-187

  Brown, L ^a   Copas, A ^b   Stephenson, J ^b   Gilleran, G ^a   Ross, J D C ^a  

^a Whittall Street Clinic ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genitourinary medicine; Patient preferences; Service delivery; Test results

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL HEALTH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; CONTACT TRACING; DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; TELEPHONE;

EID: 44349119738     PISSN: 09564624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007172     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Robinson AJ, Rogstad K, Genitourinary Medicine Modernization Group. Modernization in GUM/HIV services: what does it mean? Int J STD AIDS 2003;14:89-98
2. UK Department of Health. National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV. UK: Department of Health, 2001 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/ PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4003133&chk=/iTv%2BN]
3. Ahmed I, Hughes G. Specifications for Output Reports from GUM Clinics by PCT of Residence PHASE 1. BASHH Information Group, 2006. [www.bashh.org] (accessed June 2007)
4. Wright S, Kell P, Tobin R. How do clients access their HIV test results from genitourinary medicine services in the UK? A time for change! Int J STD AIDS 2004;15:584-6
5. Patel H, Heng EL, Aleem A, et al. Delivering results to clients: a question of satisfying needs or desires? Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:109-11
6. Dhar J, Leggat C, Bonas S. Texting - a revolution in sexual health communication. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:375-7
7. Prime K, O'Connor K, Thirlby D, Jones D, Lister P. Is texting an effective strategy for providing results? (BASHH Spring Meeting, Nottingham) Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:A18
8. Steedman NM, Thompson C. The computer facilitated telephone access system: a novel method for patient results retrieval. (BASHH Spring Meeting, Nottingham) Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:A18
9. Bowman CA, Bennett P, Kyi T. Text message services: the sexual health patient's perspective. (BASHH Spring Meeting, Nottingham) Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:A18
10. Apoola A, Radcliffe K, Das S, et al. Patient preferences for partner notification. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:327-9
11. Wright A, Chippindale S, Mercay D. Investigation into the acceptability and effectiveness of a new contact slip in the management of chlamydia trachomatis at a London genitourinary medicine clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2002;78:422-4
12. Melville C, Bigrigg A, Nandwani R. Client perspectives on sexual health service provision. Int J STD AIDS 2004;15:380-3
13. Rogstad K, Bramham L, Lowbury R, Kinghorn G. Use of a leaflet to replace verbal pretest discussion for HIV: effects and acceptability. Sex Transm Infect 2003;79:243
14. Ross JDC, Copas A, Stephenson J, Fellows L, Gilleran G. Public involvement in modernising genitourinary medicine clinics; using general public and patient opinion to influence models of service delivery. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:484-8
15. Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV. Response to the Health Select Committee Report on Sexual Health. IAG, 2004 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/05/98/04070598.pdf] (accessed June 2007)
16. Trelle S, Shang A, Nartey L, Cassell JA, Low N. Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ 2007;334:354. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39079. 460741.7C