Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of indirect composites

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-96

  Souza, Evelise M ^a,b   Francischone, Carlos E ^c   Powers, John M ^a,d   Rached, Rodrigo N ^b   Vieira, Sergio ^b  

^a Pontifical Catholic University of Parana ^*

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELLEGLASS; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLYGLASS; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; GLASS IONOMER; HERCULITE XR; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; REVOLUTION (COMPOSITE RESIN); SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE CEMENT; TETRIC CERAM; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VISCOSITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SILICATE CEMENT; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY; WATER;

EID: 44349108381     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation indirect inlay and onlay composite restorations. Pract Period Aesthet Dent 1998; 10:423-431.
2. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 128: 573-581.
3. Touati B. The evolution of aesthetic restorative materials for inlays and onlays: A review. Pract Period Aesthet Dent 1996; 8: 657-666.
4. Trushkowski RD. Ceramic optimized polymer: The next generation of esthetic restorations-Part 1. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:1101-1112.
5. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997; 9: 108-118.
6. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26: 685-694.
7. Mjör IA. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 466-472.
8. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: Bond strength. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1241-1244.
9. Dhuru VB, Lloyd CH. The fracture toughness of repaired composite. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12: 413-421.
10. Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: Bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosth Dent 1989; 61: 669-675.
11. Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of re-repaired composite resins. J Dent 1990; 18: 158-162.
12. Gregory WA, Berry S, Duke E, Dennison JB. Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:406-411.
13. Swift Jr EJ, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane-coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 200-202.
14. Lucena C, Gonzales S, Navajas JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001 ; 86:481-488.
15. Ferracane JL, Condon, JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: Properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 290-295.
16. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 187-194.
17. Park SH, Lee CS. The difference in degree of conversion between light-cured and additional heat-cured composites. Oper Dent 1996;21:213-217.
18. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vannerle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 791-795.
19. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 173-180.
20. Swift Jr EJ, Le Valley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 362-365.
21. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 59-62.
22. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 122-126.
23. Öztas N, Alaçam A, Bardakey Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 149-154.
24. Trajtenberg CT, Powers JM. Effect of hydrofluoric acid on repair bond strength of a laboratory composite. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 173-176.
25. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC. The effect of bonding agents on interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater 1986;2:153-155.
26. Burtscher P. Stability of radicals in cured composite materials. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 218-221.
27. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 1991; 16:136-140.
28. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 373-377.
29. Imamura GM, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Swift EJ Jr. Enhancement of resin bonding to heat-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1996;21:249-256.
30. Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 193-196.
31. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 189-193.
32. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. In vitro repair of three-unit fiber-reinforced composite FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 344-349.