Assessing the implementation effects of the biosafety protocol's proposed stringent information requirements for genetically modified commodities in countries of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation

Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 214-232

  Gruère, Guillaume P ^a   Rosegrant, Mark W ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349093709     PISSN: 10587195     EISSN: 14679353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00401.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BRIDGES "Constructive Ambiguity Saves LMO Labeling Discussions at MOP-3." BRIDGES Trade Biores 6, no. 5(2006):1-3.
2. Cors, T.A. "Biosafety and International Trade: Conflict or Convergence?" Int. J. Biotechnol. 2(2000):27-43.
3. Direccion Nacional de Mercados Agroalimentarios. "Contexto y Opciones Para La Exportacion Segregada de Maiz y Soja OVM y No OVM en Condiciones de Bioseguridad, Conforme al Protocolo de Cartagena." Proyecto FAO/SAGPYA TCP/ARG 2903. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 2004.
4. Foster, M., and D. Galeano. "Biosafety Protocol-Implications of the Documentation Regime." Canberra, Australia, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. ABARE eReport 06.2, 2006.
5. Gruère, G.P. "An Analysis of Trade Related International Regulations of Genetically Modified Food and their Effects on Developing Countries." EPTD Discussion Paper 147. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2006.
6. Gruère, G.P., and S.R. Rao. "A Review of International Labeling Policies for Genetically Modified Food to Evaluate India'S Proposed Rules." AgBioForum 10(April 2007):51-64.
7. Huang, J., D. Zhang, J. Yang, S. Rozelle, and N. Kalaitzandonakes. "The Costs of Implementing the Biosafety Protocol-A Look at China." IPC Technology Issue Brief 17. Washington, DC, International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council, 2006.
8. JRG Consulting Group. "Economic Assessment of the Ratification of the Cartagena Protocol, Based on the Outcome of the 1st Meeting of Parties." Final Report Prepared for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2004.
9. Kalaitzandonakes, N. "The Potential Impacts of the Biosafety Protocol on Agricultural Commodity Trade." IPC Technology Issue Brief. Washington, DC, International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council, 2004.
10. Phillips, P.W.B., and W.A. Kerr. "Alternative Paradigms: The WTO versus the Biosafety Protocol for Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms." J. World Trade 34(August 2000):63-75.
11. Redick T. P. "The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Precautionary Priority in Biotech Crop Approvals and Containment of Commodities Shipments, 2007." Colorado J. Int. Environ. Law Pol. 18(Winter 2007):51-116.
12. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. "Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes." Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000.
13. United Nations, Statistics Division. United Nations Comtrade database, DESA/UNSD. Consulted in December 2005.
14. United States Department of Agriculture. Grain Transportation Report. 28 June 2007.
15. Winham, G.R. "International Regime Conflict in Trade and Environment: The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO." World Trade Rev. 2(March 2005):131-55.