Cost Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty

Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 186-193

  Duwelius, Paul J ^a   Brenner, Jonathan S ^b   Reyner, Daniel P ^b   George, Janet C ^b  

^a PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ZIMMER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; cost saving; mini incision technique; minimally invasive; total hip arthroplasty; two incision hip procedure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REHABILITATION CARE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

EID: 44349091547     PISSN: 10454527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2008.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. DeFrances C.J., Hall M.J., and Podgornik M.N. National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data 359 (2003) 1-20 2005
2. Graves E.J. National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual summary. Vital Health Stat 13 (1993) 1-63 121
3. Muchmore L., Lynch W.D., Gardner H.H., et al. Prevalence of arthritis and associated joint disorders in an employed population and the associated healthcare, sick leave, disability, and workers' compensation benefits cost and productivity loss of employers. J Occup Environ Med 45 (2003) 369-378
4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet Accessed July 6, 2005
5. Praemer A., Furner S., and Rice D.P. The economic burden of musculoskeletal conditions, section 5, tables 15 and 16. In Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States (1999), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL
6. United States Government Accountability Office. Report to the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Ways and Means. Medicare: More Specific Criteria Needed to Classify Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities 2005 (2005) April. Report No.: GAO-05-366
7. Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) of Short-Stay Hospitals. http://63.240.208.147/statistics/medpar/default.aspc Accessed January 18, 2006
8. Berry D.J., Berger R.A., Callaghan J.J., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 2235-2246 Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003
9. Bertin K.C. Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty: A financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435 (2005) 154-163
10. Berger R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 (2003) 232-241
11. Berger R.A., and Duwelius P.J. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35 (2004) 163-172
12. Berger R.A., Jacobs J.J., Meneghini R.M., et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004) 239-247
13. MacWilliam C.H., Yood M.U., Verner J.J., et al. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 31 (1996) 623-638
14. Nilsdotter A.K., and Lohmander L.S. Patient relevant outcomes after total hip replacement: A comparison between different surgical techniques. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1 (2003) 21
15. Salmon P., Hall G.M., Peerbhoy D., et al. Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: Patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001) 360-366
16. Aarons H., Hall G., Hughes S., et al. Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 (1996) 555-558
17. Zimmer. Epoch Final Progress Report to the U.S. FDA (2002) September 16
18. Physician Compensation and Production Survey: 2003 Report Based on 2002 Data: Medical Group Management Association (2003)
19. Medicare Program: Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Years 2002-2005. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pfslookup/02_PFSsearch.asp?agree=yes&next=Accept
20. Taira D.A., Seto T.B., Siegrist R., et al. Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials. Am Heart J 145 (2003) 452-458
21. Finkler S.A. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 96 (1982) 102-109
22. Henneckens C.H., and Buring J.E. Epidemiolgy in Medicine (1987), Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA
23. Medicare Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/InpatientRehabFacPPS/LIRFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
24. Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for FY 2003. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/InpatientRehabFacPPS/LIRFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
25. Medicare Changes to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 2004 Rates. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/InpatientRehabFacPPS/LIRFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
26. Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Fiscal Year 2005. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/InpatientRehabFacPPS/LIRFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
27. FY 2002 Medicare Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities Final Rule. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/LSNFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
28. FY 2003 Medicare Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities Final Rule. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/LSNFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
29. FY 2004 Medicare Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities Final Rule. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/LSNFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
30. FY 2005 Medicare Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities Final Rule. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/LSNFF/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
31. Medicare Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/list.as Accessed January 17, 2006
32. Medicare Update to the Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies for FY02. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/list.as Accessed January 17, 2006
33. Medicare Update to the Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies for FY03. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/list.as Accessed January 17, 2006
34. Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for FY 2004. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/list.as Accessed January 17, 2006
35. CMS Manual System, Pub. 100-20, One Time Notification, Transmittal 59. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R59OTN.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
36. Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for Calendar Year 2005. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/list.asp Accessed January 17, 2006
37. 2002 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PhysicianFeeSched/PFSRVF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
38. 2003 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PhysicianFeeSched/PFSRVF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
39. 2004 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PhysicianFeeSched/PFSRVF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
40. 2005 National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PhysicianFeeSched/PFSRVF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
41. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/wkyeng_01262005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
42. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/wkyeng_01262005.pdf Accessed January 16, 2006
43. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_01162003.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
44. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_01192005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
45. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_03232005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
46. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_05182005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
47. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_07142005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
48. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_09152005.pdf Accessed January 17, 2006
49. FY 2002 PPS Payment Impact File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/HIF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
50. FY 2003 PPS Payment Impact File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/HIF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
51. FY 2004 PPS Payment Impact File. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/HIF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
52. FY 2005 Final Impact. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/HIF/list.asp Accessed January 16, 2006
53. Melhorn J.M. Impairment and disability evaluations: Understanding the process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A (2001) 1905-1911
54. Mahadevia P.J., Strell J., Kunaprayoon D., et al. Cost savings from intravenous immunoglobulin manufactured from chromotography/caprylate (IGIV-C) in persons with primary humoral immunodeficiency disorder. Value Health 8 (2005) 488-494
55. Gold M., Siegel J., Russell L., et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
56. Brazier J., Roberts J., Tsuchiya A., et al. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 13 (2004) 873-884
57. Brazier J.E., and Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 42 (2004) 851-859
58. Brazier J.E., Roberts J., and Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21 (2002) 271-292
59. Ware J.E.J., Snow K.K., Kosinski M.K., et al. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide (1993), Nimrod Press, Boston, MA
60. Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M., et al. How to Score the SF-36 Health Survey (1994), Medical Outcomes Trust, Boston, MA
61. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 (1969) 737-755
62. Rosenbaum P.R., and Rubin D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1983) 41-55
63. Indurkhya A., Mitra N., and Schrag D. Using propensity scores to estimate the cost-effectiveness of medical therapies. Stat Med (2005)
64. Rubin D.B. Inference and Missing Data. Biometrika 63 (1976) 581-592
65. Tang L., Song J., Belin T.R., et al. A comparison of imputation methods in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. Stat Med 24 (2005) 2111-2128
66. Zhao S.Z., Fiechtner J.I., Tindall E.A., et al. Evaluation of health-related quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with celecoxib. Arthritis Care Res 13 (2000) 112-121
67. Oostenbrink J.B., and Al M.J. The analysis of incomplete cost data due to dropout. Health Econ 14 (2005) 763-776
68. Barnes S.A., Lindborg S.R., and Seaman Jr. J.W. Multiple imputation techniques in small sample clinical trials. Stat Med (2005)
69. SAS for the Personal Computer (2002), SAS, Inc, Cary, NC Version 9.1
70. Kreder H.J., Deyo R.A., Koepsell T., et al. Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 485-494
71. Hooker J.A., Lachiewicz P.F., and Kelley S.S. Efficacy of prophylaxis against thromboembolism with intermittent pneumatic compression after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 (1999) 690-696
72. Katz J.N., Losina E., Barrett J., et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1622-1629
73. Hart R., Stipcak V., Janacek M., et al. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 71 (2005) 60-64
74. Kurtz S., Mowat F., Ong K., et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1487-1497
75. Owings M.F., and Lawrence L. Detailed diagnoses and procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1997. Vital Health Stat 13 (1999) 1-157
76. Birrell F., Johnell O., and Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: Influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 58 (1999) 569-572
77. O'Brien B.J., Spath M., Blackhouse G., et al. A view from the bridge: Agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ 12 (2003) 975-981
78. Petrou S., and Hockley C. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. Health Econ (2005)
79. Bryan S., and Longworth L. Measuring health-related utility: Why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D?. Eur J Health Econ 6 (2005) 253-260
80. Feeny D., Wu L., and Eng K. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res 13 (2004) 1659-1670
81. Kopec J.A., and Willison K.D. A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 56 (2003) 317-325
82. Longworth L., and Bryan S. An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ 12 (2003) 1061-1067