Impact of sensor noise magnitude on emergent features of ecological interface design

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 319-323

  St Cyr, Olivier ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ERGONOMICS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); ULTRASONIC SENSORS;

ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN (EID) INTERFACE; SENSOR NOISE MAGNITUDE; SINGLE-SENSOR SINGLE-INDICATOR (SSSI) INTERFACES;

ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT;

EID: 44349084711     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bennett, K. B., & Flach, J. M. (1992). Graphical Displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34, 513-533.
2. Pawlak, W., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). Inducing effective operator control through ecological interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 653-688.
3. Reising, D. V. C. (1999). The impact of instrumentation location and reliability on the performance of operators using an ecological interface for process control. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.
4. Reising, D. V. C. & Sanderson, P. M. (2002a). Work domain analysis and sensors I: Principles and simple example. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 569-596.
5. Reising, D. V. C. & Sanderson, P. M. (2002b). Work domain analysis and sensors II: Pasteurizer II case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 597-637.
6. Reising, D. V. C. & Sanderson, P. M. (2004). Minimal instrumentation may compromise failure diagnosis with an ecological interface. Human Factors, 46, 316-333.
7. th Annual Meeting, pp. 538-542.
8. th Annual Meeting, pp. 417-421.
9. Torenvliet, G. L., Jamieson, G. A., & Vicente, K. J. (2000). Making the most of ecological interface design: The role of individual differences. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 395-408.
10. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ: Mahwah.
11. Vicente, K. J. (2002). Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges. Human Factors, 44, 62-78.
12. Vicente, K. J., and Rasmussen, J. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems II: Mediating "direct perception" in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2, 207-250.
13. Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-22, 589-606.
14. Vicente, K. J., Moray, N., Lee, J. D., Rasmussen, J., Jones, B. G., Brock, R., & Djemil, T. (1996). Evaluation of a Rankine Cycle Display for Nuclear Power Plant Monitoring and Diagnosis. Human Factors, 38, 506-521.
15. Watanabe, O. (2001). Issues toward practical application of ecological interface to real world. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Ecological Approach to Human Work Interface, Tokai, Japan.
16. Wickens, C. D., Lee, J., Liu, Y. D., & Gordon-Becker, S. (2004). An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, Second Edition. Prentice Hall, NJ: Upper Saddle.